. f ak k sae a a
4 y 1 ry a et 1 ” * = ss +a * 1 eeeesttty i —* _ af
ey | BE aie! Seg Se Ae AS *, fg, Re
= a * + 2.
A 4 ? FF SI - - + ° + et * ar z a 4
4 4 i} i = . * * a. i 4 +
I j { 4 3 as 4 i Ww : 7 Py a —_ Hi 1 + + ' FY, ?
i 5 i iy \ ~~ . - at - =f = wet tl ra = pe gine 4
af j * = ] # © = = ™ ™ Lr - " tee Fen ey +, =~.
i ‘y j \ i t == ] 1 z & gé . FX ay ; i <2 * : git hae :
f { t . + ik sn 4 ea " <~ + + 4 ar jf hy
vet f { i } sors at, 4 8 aon * : a z * : . . i uae 2
. al = = *
ATLA ie ERe STS cae ans ee ee ee
ro \y tits ee? SS . + vA a
PCS SALES s eA Cue oe es
4 = + N t = * + vie r
1 { | | \ j ; i lyf ir +. + £ . oo \ * k: a Qo "a0
Set et ya Se Pe ts mS ee ey
os = . rs + * .
‘| EET Piss t i += tug fi rs, * : my mae? '
= = -_ Y a? bal ats 1
Wh hN gate tl PE PF eb OY aR PMS hd
af 1 ,. ui ipk* * « r + : + oy rat ON soe
' i 4 \ Ba , \ + r mod as nee aa ae =
\ { Ve \- oie as rt - 4 ae 2” wy rad
7 =- sac 4 =e a = a
pth See “4 : sda TES 58
\ < . ‘ 4 " 4 oh =
Vaya ict a es ee
WARE ee eae s,
. ? a4
. Hi + 7 so
5 \y\ \ \ ‘4 y L 2 . af .
\ = = = a +
{ \ \ 4 AES a + a. . '
BEN be he
qfr,t { oy . eed 5 :
rivet % FF UR ee
= = af
: l ——H—
\ ' iV ty th 4 + a oo ‘
: : ¢ :
+ L 4 V4 + + mF
. = .
. I ' \ :
© l ents é
a4 al 11 -
aI Cheer reerre
ij
-
ry
a ee |
ey
SreRTT
Hig. 2 Ancana hirsuta: A. branchlet with mature flower x 1. B. detail
| : A. | . B. of flower with | outer and
removed X 3. C. inner surface of inner petal x 3. D. carpel X 12. E. L.S. carpel x 25. F. outer enon te
inner stamen X 12. H. stamen with dehisced anthers x 12. 1 I
Jessup 706; D-H, Jessup 512: I, Jessup 478 nearly mature monocarps in dry state X 2. A-C,
Jessup, Ancana 67
prominently raised below; tertiary venation reticulate to percurrent. Petiole 2—2.5 mm
long, hirsute. Pedicel 2-4 mm long, pubescent, with 2 or 3 broadly ovate bracts 1.5-2.2
mm long. Sepals broadly ovate, abruptly acuminate, 4.5—5.5 mm X 4-4.8 mm, pubescent
on outside, glabrous on inner side. Outer petals narrowly ovate, attenuate, convex on
outside, concave on inner side, 30-40 mm X 8-9 mm at 5—7 mm from base, ca 0.2
mm thick at midlength, appressed hairy outside, softly pubescent on inner side. Inner
petals narrowly ovate, attenuate, 30-48 mm X 7-9 mm at 4-6 mm from base, ca 0.2
mm thick at midlength; outer surface pubescent, convex near base, elsewhere flat; inner
surface concave near base, glabrous, multigrooved, the grooves becoming fewer and
wider distally and extending for about 1/4-1/3 the length of the petal, towards apex flat
or with incurved margins, pubescent. Stamens 45-60, 1.2-2 mm long; anther cells 0.8-
1.6 mm long. Carpels 5-11(-16), ovaries 1.8-2 mm long with appressed hairs ca 0.5
mm long. Ovules 4-6. Ripe monocarps (when dried) up to 2cm X | cm, hirsute, the
hairs ca 1 mm long, brown. Seeds 1-5. Fig. 2.
Specimens examined: Queensland. Cook District: Cedar Bay, N of Bloomfield R, Oct 1972, Webb & Tracey
13359 (Dick 8) (BRI); ditto, Jan 1973, Webb & Tracey 13360 (Dick 24) (BRI); near entrance to Mossman Gorge
National Park, near Mossman R, Dec 1982, Jessup 544, 545 (BRI), ditto, Dec 1984, Jessup 706 (BRI); Crawfords
Lookout to Tchupalla Falls Track, Palmerston National Park, Feb 1982, Jessup 478 & Tracey (BRI,QRS), Henrietta
Ck, Palmerston Highway, Nov 1982, Jessup 512 (BRI,CBG,K,L,MEL,NSW,QRS,U).
Distribution and habitat: This species has been found only in three refugia in north
eastern Queensland: at Cedar Bay, along the Mossman River and the North Johnstone
River. It occurs on lowlands and footslopes in complex mesophyll vine forest on soil
derived from basalt or a mixture of acidic and basic rock types.
Discussion
The relationships of Ancana with other genera are still unclear. Waha and Morawetz
(1988) have shown that the genus shares a disulcate pollen character with Fitzalania
and Haplostichanthus as well as the 2n = 18 chromosome number.
The genera Meiogyne, Polyaulax, Guamia and Oncodostigma all have a warted
or grooved inner surface to the inner petals near the base, axillary flowers, flat, oblique
connectives to the stamens and a subglobular stigma all similar to those in Ancana.
Ancana differs from Meiogyne, Guamia and Oncodostigma in having fewer ovules per
carpel. Meiogyne has predominantly Early Phase venation while Guamia, Oncodostigma
and Polyaulax have predominantly Middle Phase venation (Klucking 1986). The venation
of Ancana is also largely Middle Phase. Po/yaulax differs from the other genera by
having much shorter and thicker petals.
Acknowledgements
Mr W. Smith prepared the line drawings. Mr R. Henderson offered helpful criticism
of the manuscript.
References
FRIES, R.E. (1953). Verstreute Beobachtungen der Familie Annonaceae. Arkiv for botanik utgivet av k. svenska
vetenskapsakademien. Stockholm. 3(2): 36-37.
FRIES. R.E. (1959). Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien 17a: }—47 1.
HUTCHINSON, J. (1964). The Genera of Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons I: 71-108. London: Oxford University
Press.
KLUCKING, E.P. (1986). Leaf Venation Patterns. Volume i. Annonaceae. Berlin, Stuttgart: J. Cramer.
MORAWETZ, W. (1988). Karyosystematics and evolution of Australian Annonaceae as compared with Eupom-
atiaceae. Himantandraceae and Austrobaileyaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 159: 49-79.
WAHA. M. & MORAWETZ W. (1988). Pollen evolution and systematics in Annonaceae with special reference
to the disulcate Australian endemic genera. Plant Systematics and Evolution 161: 1-i2.
Accepted for publication 23 January 1989
Austrobaileya 3(1): 69-78 (1989) 69
SECAMONE R. BR. (ASCLEPIADACEAE: SECAMONOIDEAE)
IN AUSTRALIA
P.J. Forster
Botany Department, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4067
and K. Harold
6 Woodland Rise, Wakefield, WF2 9DL, England
Summary
Secamone is represented in Australia by a single variable species, S. elliptica R. Br. which also occurs in Malesia.
Lectotypes are designated for §. elliptica and the synonyms S. ovata R. Br. and S. papuana Warb. S. lanceolata
Blume, S. micrantha (Decne) Decne, S. attenuata Decne, S. multiflora Decne and S. flavida Schltr. are newly
placed in synonymy. An illustrated taxonomic account with notes on variation, distribution, ecology, habitat and
conservation status is given.
Introduction
Taxa included within the subfamily Secamonoideae (Asclepiadaceae) are charac-
terised by the anthers being dithecal and tetrasporangiate, with two pollinia in each
theca (Schill & Jakel 1978). Thus the Secamonoideae differ from the two other subfamilies
of Asclepiadaceae in having 4 pollinia per pollinarium, as opposed to 2 in the Asclepia-
doideae and an aggregation of granular pollen in the Periplocoideae.
Floral development in species of Secamone has been extensively investigated,
primarily by Safwat (1962) but also by Puri and Shiam (1966). Safwat (1962) outlined
in detail how the bilocular anthers of the Asclepiadoideae (as Cynanchoideae) are a
result of phylogenetic suppression of the two outer locules of each anther, whereas in 4-
celled anthers in the Secamonoideae no suppression has occurred. In Secamone, the
entire style-head is glandular in comparison to the 5 glandular regions found in the
Asclepiadoideae.
The genus Secamone R. Br. was first validly described in Brown (1810a) and not
in Brown (1810b) as listed in Farr et a/. (1979). Brown (1810b) was issued as a preprint
of Brown (1811) and was intended to be simultaneously published with Brown (1810a),
but the Prodromus predates the preprint by some seven days (Mabberley 1985). As
listed in Farr et a/. (1979), Phillips (1951) lectotypified Secamone with S. emetica (Retz.)
R. Br. ex Schultes based on Periploca emetica Retz. The combination was not effectively
published in Secamone until 1820; however it is quite clear that Brown (1810b) included
the taxon it refers to within his concept of Secamone, despite his not formally transferring
the name. Hence it is not considered necessary to relectotypify with a type specimen of
one of the names published in Brown (1810a).
Species of Secamone are widely distributed in Africa, India, south-east Asia and
New Guinea with two species (S. e/liptica R. Br. and S. ovata R. Br.) having been
described from Australia (Brown 1810a). No critical account of Secamone in Australia
has been provided since that of Bentham (1869) who accepted both of Brown’s species.
Bentham’s treatment was copied by Bailey (1900). Bentham commented that S. ovata,
the second of the two species described by Brown in his Prodromus, was doubttully
distinct, differing from S. e/liptica only in the broader, more ovate and obtuse or scarcely
acute, shortly petiolate leaves.
Materials and Methods
Herbarium material at BRI, BRIU, CANB, DNA, JCT, LAE, MEL, NSW (partial
holdings only), NT, PERTH, QRS and photographs or microfiches of types at BM, K,
G and P were examined. Information on material at B and L were obtained from the
Directors or relevant staff of those institutions. Material was collected or procured
70 Austrobatleya 3({1}: 1989
throughout the species’ range in Australia. In the citation of specimens, preference has
been given to fertile collections that demonstrate the variation in the species and cover
its geographic range. Material preserved in spirit is indicated by an *. No index to
collectors has been included as most material in Australian herbaria has now been
determined.
Taxonomic Treatment
Secamone R. Br., Prod. 464 (1810). Type: Periploca emetica Retz. (S. emetica (Retz.) R.
Br. ex Schultes) (lecto, fide Phillips 1951).
Asclepiadeae 44 (1810); Mem. Wern. Nat. Hist. Soc. 1: 55 (1811); Blume, Bijdr.
1049-1051 (1826); Decne, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. 343 (1838); Decne in DC., Prod.
8: 500-504 (1844); Mig., Fl. Ned. Ind. 2: 471-474 (1856); Wight, Contr. bot.
India 60 (1834); Endl., Gen. pl. 8: 589 (1838); Walp., Ann. bot. syst. 3: 48 (1852):
Benth., Fl. austral. 4: 327-328 (1869); Benth. in Benth. & J.D. Hook., Gen. pl.
2: 146 (1876); J.D. Hook., Fl. Brit. India 4: 12-13 (1885); K. Schum. in Engl. &
Prantl, Nat. Pilanzenfam. 4(2): 261-263 (1897); Schitr., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 50: 89-
90 (1914); Merrill, Enum. Philipp. fl. pl. 3: 342-343 (1923); Ridley, Fl. Malay
Penins. 2: 375 (1923); Backer & Bakhuizen van den Brink, Fl. Java 2: 254 (1965);
H. Huber, Rev. Handbk. Fl. Ceylon 4: 88-89 (1983).
Derivation of Name: From the Arabic name for one species.
Woody lianes with white latex. Stems slender to thickened with corky outgrowths, twining
or trailing, glabrous. Roots fibrous. Leaves flattened in cross-section, coriaceous or
herbaceous, opposite, margins entire, glabrous (occasionally pubescent), extrafloral nec-
taries lacking or present at lamina base, petiolate with small stipular structures at base.
Cymes appearing at nodes between the pair of leaves, |-many-flowered. Sepals 5, distinct,
generally with glands at base of lobes. Corolla deeply 5-lobed, subrotate, petals contorted
in bud, right hand edges overlapping. Staminal corona of 5 laterally compressed lobes,
adnate to the base of the staminal column. Stamens inserted at corolla-tube base, connate:
anthers with short incurved terminal membrane. Pollinaria each with 4 pollinia; pollinia
smooth, erect, 2 in each anther theca, globose or ellipsoid; corpusculum rounded; caudicles
flattened and very short. Gynostegium flat-topped to umbonate with obtuse or capitate
style-head enclosed by stamens; ovaries free, glabrous. Follicles lanceloid to ovoid or
angular, smooth or roughened; triangular to semi-terete in cross-section, often paired.
Seeds flat, ovate, brown, comose at germinating end only.
One species in Australia. Worldwide ca 20 species.
secamone elliptica R. Br., Prod. 464 (1810). Type: Carpentaria, Groote Islands [Queens-
land], 4 January 1803, R. Brown 8 [Iter Australiense 2871] (lecto (designated
here): BM(piece directly in middle of sheet); isolecto: BRI(AQ333111),
MEL(MEL1553064)).
Sprengel, Syst. veg. 1: 837 (1825); Decne in DC., Prod. 8: 504 (1844); Benth., FI.
austral. 4: 327 (1869); Bailey, Cat. pl. Queens]. 30 (1890); Queensl. fl. 3: 997-998
(1900); Compr. cat. Queensl. pl. 325 (1913); Maiden & Betche, Census New South
Wales pl. 174 (1916); Williams & Harden, Rainforest Climbing pl. 39 (1980),
Jacobs & Pickard, Pl. New South Wales 70 (1981); Williams, Students fl. N.E.
New South Wales 5: 721-722 (1984); Williams, Native pl. Queensl. 2: 258-259
(1984); Green, Census vasc. pl. Western Austral. 145 (1985); Dunlop, Checklist
vasc. pl. Northern Territory 9 (1987).
Secamone ovata R. Br., Prod. 464 (1810) synon. nov. Type: Coen River, Carpentaria
[Queensland], 6 November 1802, R. Brown 9 [Iter Australiense 2870] (lecto
(designated here): BM(2 sheets); isolecto: CANB).
Sprengel, Syst. veg. 1: 837 (1825); Benth., Fl. austral. 4: 328 (1869); Bailey, Cat.
pl. Queensl. 30 (1890); Queensl. fl. 3: 998 (1900); Compr. cat. Queensl. pl. 325
(1913).
Secamone lanceolata Blume, Bijdr. 1051 (1826) synon. nov. Type: Java (fide Bak-
huizen van den Brink 1950).
Bakhuizen van den Brink, Blumea 6: 371 (1950); Backer & Bakhuizen van den
Brink, Fl. Java 2: 254 (1965).
"~~ ‘i 0 hn ee ee te te ee wwe een ‘en nne PWM EB WY By WB a a Wwe MY MM wt Be Met Haw Ba HI Why my Hy Hy yy Hp Hi Hy Hy My Hy Dy Hy yy HHH yy Hy Hh hy Hy HI yy HH y Hy HH HH, I, yy MH HH hy Hy mm peng ii ni iin I I EM I MM My Be a tH Ma Ma Ba BB Me WW Bh wt a Ba Mh MB Mh aM MMM WB WP WWM Bo Mao wh WM a Ma Mh MW WW Wie Pon eee 2 ME Yon OnE OEE Yoo OEE REE 1 A Pe Ph 17 ns Me PO Ph Ph i Pn Mah A a Py By Py Pm Mo Mo i Py ath eM Pe Ma ty BI IM
yer abba Et at att a AEN A EE A oe tate NG, BASEN Ie diowaath abd thse aul MM bits ec Anta nab toma nate entation lant dita a tS EASA le at Nt
SAE RRA ats Bb AE a ie a BS a an a Ne BM ian tie abana ak
hs Bh
71
iew
ing
lv
. apica
o
x
te
ie
a
=)
—
le
E
i corona with style-head protud
fk
rai, “es . “ a, et Ten, O8
ve i PART 4 dt baat an re ppcttl =
Ba! a io i eet ve : eas oc
a” % 1! o r. a v " s {ht
a Cal om + a
7 Sf
d glands at sepal bases x
ind
o¢ "5
+e
a eT id
al
7
4
iew of stam
(c = corpuscie) X 70. All from Forster 988.
Ing OVaTFICS an
When
ae
b 4
* Poa yim ll
> w
hoot with little branched cymes X |. B. leaf X |
i corona X 40. G. side v
Ind
iptica
A. flowering s
| view of stam
iptica
as
»
=
+
. apica
Vera
ete te at
~~?
inarla in rotating sequence
Fig. 1. Secamone elliptica:
D. flower with gynostegium and corolla removed show
Forster & Harold, Secamone ell
of flower X 10. F
x 40. H. Pol!
72 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Secamone micrantha (Decne) Decne, Etud. Ascl. Ann. Nat. (1838), in DC., Prod.
8: 501 (1844) synon. nov. Tylophora micrantha Decne, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist.
Nat. 3: 377 (1834). Type: Timor, 1821, Spanoghe s.n. (syn: G, 3 sheets (photo!);
isosyn: K(photo!), MEL(MEL1553191); Timor, Zippel s.n. (syn: G(microfiche!);
isosyn: K(photo!),P(photo!); Java, Zollinger s.n. (syn: P(photo!); [Java] Soerakarta,
1802-1818, 7. Horsfield s.n. Gsosyn: K(photo!)).
Mia., Fl. Ned. Ind. 2: 472 (1856); Craib, Bull. Misc. Inform. 1911: 415 (1911);
Cost. in Lecomte, Fl. Indo-Chine 4: 41 (1912); Ridley, Fl. Malay Penins. 2: 375
(1923); Tsiang, Sunyatsenia 4: 57 (1939).
Secamone attenuata Decne in DC., Prod. 8: 501 (1844) synon. nov. Type: Philippine
Islands, Island of Mindoro, H. Cuming 1536 (holo: G; 1so: BM,K(2 sheets,
photo!),P(2 sheets, photo!).
Mia., Fl. Ned. Ind. 2: 472 (1856); Vidal, Phan. Cuming. philipp. 127 (1885),
Revis. pl. vasc. filip. 187 (1886); Merrill, Enum. philipp. fl. pl. 3: 342 (1923).
Secamone multiflora Decne in DC., Prod. 8: 501 (1844) synon. nov. Type: Philippine
Islands, Province of Cagayan, Luzon, H. Cuming 1284 (iso: BM,
BRI(AQ333115),KQ sheets, photo!),L,MEL(MEL1553192),P(2 sheets, photo!)).
Mig., Fl. Ned. Ind. 2: 472 (1856); Vidal, Phan. Cuming. philipp. 127 (1885),
Revis. pl. vasc. filip. 187 (1886); Merrill, Enum. philipp. fl. pl. 3: 342 (1923).
Secamone papuana Warb., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 18: 206 (1894). synon. nov. Type: “Dutch
New Guinea”, 1888, O. Warburg 21322 (lecto (here designated): BRI; isolecto:
A(n.v.)).
Secamone flavida Schitr., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 50: 89-90 (1914) synon. nov. Type:
Nordéstl. Neu-Guinea: Hane in den Waldern am Minjem-Thor, February 1908,
R. Schlechter (B f).
Cynanchum dichasiale O. Schwarz in Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 24: 94
(1927). Type: Bleeser 586 (syn: B, n.v.; isosyn: NSW); Darwin, Bleeser 244 (syn:
B, n.v.; isosyn: MEL).
Blake, Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland 59: 168 (1948).
[Secamone emetica auct. non (Retz.) R. Br. ex Schultes: F. Muell., Fragm. 5: 161
(1866). |
Woody liane. Stems green when young, with age there develops grey, hard, fissured bark;
up to 10 cm diameter, up to at least 10 m long, twining, much branched. Leaves
herbaceous, glabrous or with sparse indumentum of uniseriate hairs; lamina elliptic,
narrow-elliptic, lanceolate or ovate, 20-60 mm long, 6-35 mm wide, tip acuminate or
acute, base acute or rounded; petiole 3-8 mm long, 0.5-1 mm diameter. Cymes with
few to many branches, borne on first 4 or 5 nodes below apex, up to 2 cm wide; peduncle
2-3 mm long, 0.75 mm diameter, finely pubescent with uniseriate hairs. Flowers 2 mm
long, 2-5 mm diameter; pedicels 2-4 mm long, | mm diameter, finely pubescent with
uniseriate hairs. Sepals 0.75-1.5 mm long, 0.75-1.5 mm wide, ovate, finely pubescent,
0-3 glands present at base. Corolla lobes reflexed, with a concave base, obtuse, glabrous,
greenish yellow, 1.5-2 mm long, 1.25-1.5 mm wide. Staminal corona 1.25-1.5 mm long,
1.25~1.5 mm diameter; corona lobes adnate to base of anthers, curving inwards, subulate-
cylindrical, 0.25-0.75 mm long, 0.2-0.25 mm diameter. Staminal column 1.5 mm long,
| mm wide; anther appendages 0.25 mm long, 0.25 mm wide; slit between anther wings
0.5-0.75 mm long. Style-head projecting past anther connectives, flattened globose, 0.25-
0.5 mm long, 0.3 mm diameter. Ovaries 0.5 mm long, 0.5 mm wide (both). Pollinaria
0.20 mm long, 0.20 mm wide, golden; pollinia (singly) 0.12-0.13 mm long, 0.07-0.08
mm wide; corpusculum 0.10-0.11 mm long, 0.07-0.10 mm wide; caudicles 0.10 mm
long, 0.02 mm wide. Follicles terete-ovoid, 40-100 mm long, 7-13 mm diameter; seed
ovate, tan, 7-10 mm long, 2-3 mm wide; coma 23-35 mm long.
Selected specimens: Philippine Islands. MINDANAO: Buayan, Cotabato Province, Apr 1932, Ramos & Edano
85131 (BRI). Timor. Port Timor, E of Manotutu, Dec 1953, van Steenis 18007 (CANB). Papua New Guinea.
Tarara, Wassi Kussa, Dec 1936, Brass 8501 (A,BRI); Tavai Ck area, ca 43 miles [71 km] SE of Port Moresby,
9°44’S, 147°26’E, May 1967, Pullen 6878 (A,;CANB,L,LAE); Yule Is, 8°50’S, 146°32’E, Womersley & Simmonds
NGF7107 (CANB,LAE). Australia. Western Australia. Broome Harbour, [7°58’S, 122°14E, Jan 1971, Allan 597
(CANB,PERTH): Walsh Pt, Port Warrender, Admiralty Gulf, 14°34’S, 125°S1’E, Jan 1982, Kenneally 7824
(CANB,PERTH). Northern Territory. East Pt, Darwin area, 12°24’S, 130°56’E, Jan 1988, Stobo [AQ408478]
(BRI*); Channel Pt, 13°10’S, 130°08’E, Nov 1982, Wightman 329 & Dunlop (CANB,DNA*,MEL,PERTH).
Queensland. Cook District: Mapoon -— lily lagoon, S of Cullen Point (Port Musgrave), 11°59’S, 14i°52’E, Jun
1981, Mforton AM1265 (BRI,MEL): Eastern Beach beyond Pearling Stn, Paki Is, 10°44’S, 142°13’S, Jan 1987,
Guuness 2100 (BRI*). NortH KenNepy District: 40 Mile Scrub, 18°O1’S, 144°45’E, Jan 1972, Hyland 5888
Forster & Harold, Secamone elliptica 73
:
+ * a
eg ot ! 7! —_* «
= = = =
Foyis a * 1. alr * an, F * -~ *
‘ . 7
"s,4 7 - * 2 "a D a+ *
oe 2% 4 Pn a en! + 2s +
* ~ = ao
ee ee ee aa aw gt tt .2 ‘ *
r a; + =
ae +e tee Dt, ttt" s* 4 BaF ie fi
* ©
eee cad Fe my wk = = - = +
aes ante Pa r . *
=<
yea re r een : * * *
gare yt 7 a » * a + . = -
. * tor fF fF * 7 eee ? = =
=
4 -~ * 4, a -— *
we
oa a + * "La.
* Ea =
et ee ee =
* on ai + a
=
ae, t «fF
- + - 7.
a Ga * « ™ -*
al =
"4% tae =
- +
= *, = Ff 2 my
~ 727 * , FF .
at 7 8 4 te .
. =
= = *
Te Pp ae we
pe ty gar Os
ra
"ara, tt eat?
i. tee fF =.
=
= +
a Fal -
~-. , =% 2
Pa =
a mk ¥F* - *
ae "=, a
"Fs *
af aoe
as = = +
a
+
=, * a r
+ ao ee +
se. « 7 7
= sa = i
= = Fy
-? e",?
. * 1 -
se tL s 2 *
ee a
© Pan atF®
. * ea *
=
= © s * 8
7% . me 2
* =
=
was 1 = ee
oat * =
‘~: ate .
at Pe + = a7,
et <* ey * zis
+ at wast 7 wt fC 4 + +
tee a * * = 2
¥ 1 so gt? * “
=
* = * a
al a“ 4 Gs 7 a+
eee re
-— +
= Ps ws
aes et “
+ = 7
. sad
* * we Fs ©
* bao e, 4%
‘ "4, ae Tay
ove rat . ate,
a rae —** + =e
te 4 a ya "t *
- i
. es * eee
aarereer = . v4 ee
Eg ~ + . =
me = * ? ”
= * oe oF" - * " >
Fr *e *y set “ «= = bie
* - +
a eee = * =
ae “seis t 7" a re +.
. t _ ww, * T.
*s : =* y= "oe
at st*t, * wt?” =
7, = La
* + x a Pa
at —_ ae *
' ~*~. sie i
. x ts r
* * “ae ~ «
ig > bd a * .
* = -* = te
sear : * = fring rt i
ss) Peg wr? 7 : ;
= = * =
* * *
7 tees” * asta sb 7, + * + oat
* JF + ko * F=y
= m7 aoa t aw a
3: ' . s+ :
Ld a + 1 -
~*~ % * - /
+i * “ a7 i
ef +; = Peer
fal a? ., rT. z ait :
at at af - a ghte 3
rr nae or * + of afFa 3
i, F oi ‘ a * Fa * = Tt A
an ® = ant = + - ht
+ + a* ae - = + ih >
ao 9 ee WS ia ae = an pd 4 4a 3 ?
; Ss ha attove Es ase :
-s a i ee, Fs oe Nok: ee >
i i types hy r Fe eye; + wy" vr has >
be = ete ‘e :
+ # if 5 = 7 Pee eo >
* at = * = Fae 1 |
: . - a” padta,
* q ts *aae ett ee es fas =
: ¥s lite + =" = ee ee ia :
we L Par i as oe “ty eo teat a = E
2 : ‘ 3 hte :
¥
:
‘
¥
:
¥
=
t
¥
:
¥
r
¥
=
i
z
?
.
z
x
=
é
¥
:
}
i
¥
>
i
i
i
H
H
i
*
i
:
:
:
+
2
:
:
:
£
a
a
+
z
a
a
-
z
sa
=
£
x
=
:
:
*
=
=
ze
Naa arent eg A grt a ed NS ee a et eon lo oan arg Wo ea an Ot Me eg
ro
.
+
ae”
od
~
~t" * +
+ & =
._ a sO te aa ix
aarti e * ew te es ee i
= + rey ae? ¥ = * = ay = =
“ es ee Sa > FATS
wT - wee x tire 1 Fe ae a] L —_
=f Ett ott 2 ae ry ee
ae . eae tS LO ake oad a artis
Tate A +e 7 "ee -2- =~ * nt ty aS tS ot ed +
Pera, a aoe A =F ts s Fe Py ‘ive +
tates - eset RTA b oon
To. ' * 7 * ed
14a ' + 42 *k 4 =
1 > wa =, 2", re + *
* ate inky * =, Marea as, * ¥
=
a&rt goes awh wei * as J
ee ee a ae s * *
- tee 7 = q = vi
teat yatta te A r 4 ~ x
rte w* ty ges al * tel E
ae = a ewer y
ae ee er aa q
mean sat by id t? H
ee ee “; _ . #
bi ol a =; at E
whe 4 * § 5 = Py v
ae ered gbare te Hs
weg reals =e i
git ste, * 2 om q
= eee tote “fs ¥ *
* oat ow BF eu x!
., oe te 7 4%
+; *, + * ve +,
as at a wv u +
t 7 = 7+ =
os = .
*; a
COAG Dane aC OO oko cece coro
fish
“
TEESE AAR ay
tit eem acne
“ccmen mane
Fig. 2. Secamone elliptica: A. trip of flowering stem & two other separate cymes demonstrating much branched
nature X 1. B. leaf X 1. C. single flower X 10. D. flower with gynostegium and corolla removed showing ovaries
and glands at sepal bases X 20. E. apical view of flower X 10. F. apical view of staminal corona X 40. G. side
bei of ae corona with style-head protuding x 40. H. pollinaria in rotating sequence < 70. All from
unness
PEER EA SERB aE
74 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
(BRI,CANB,QRS), Fletcher Ck, 2 km SW of Mt Keelbottom, 19°49’S, 146°0S’E, Mar 1988, Forster & Bolton 3620
(BRI*). MITCHELL District: near Jericho, Apr 1946, Clemens [AQ216898] (BRI). LEICHHARDT District: Apis
Ck, ca 40 km N of Marlborough, 22°40’S, 149°35’E, Apr 1975, Craven 3145 (BRI,CANB); Wolfang Peak, 22°33%S,
147°50’E, Mar 1988, Forster 3609 (BRI). Port Curtis District: Dan Dan S.F., 24°LO/’S, ISP°OS’E, Dec 1987,
Gibson [AQ408480] (BRI*). BURNETT District: 4.5 km NNE of Monogorilby, 26°01’S, [SP°OVVE, Dec 1981,
Forster 988 (BRI*). Wipe Bay District: Mt Glastonbury, 26°14’S, 152°29'E, Jan 1987, Forster & Sharpe 2875
(BRI*). MorRETON District: Flinton Hill, Worlds End Pocket, 27°31’S, 152°45’E, Dec 1987, Forster 3309 (BRI*).
New South Wales. Sandiland Ranges, Nov 1904, Boorman (NSW). New Caledonia. Magenta, Noumea, Dec 1960,
McKee 7835 (CANB); Ouen Toro, hill at S end of Noumea, Jan 1982, McPherson 4560 (BRI; MO n:.¥.).
Distribution, habitat and ecology: S. e/liptica is widely distributed in the Philippine
Islands, Malesia, New Guinea, in northern and eastern tropical to subtropical Australia
(Map 1), and New Caledonia. S. el/liptica occurs as a woody liane in the canopy of
numerous rainforest types, including semi-evergreen vine thicket, araucarian microphyll
vine forest, araucarian notophyll vine forest, notophyll vine forest and low microphyll
vine forest, on a variety of soil types including red krasnozems, red euchrozems, black
earth and quartz sands, and on different types of rock outcrops. It is commonly used as
a host plant by larvae of Euploea core corinna (MacLeay) (Common Crow Butterfly)
(Sankowsky 1975), which feeds on a wide range of Asclepiadaceous hosts (Scheermeyer
& Zalucki 1985; Forster 1987).
Seed germinates within 3-4 days of planting if fresh and the seedlings (Fig. 4B)
make rapid growth, reaching 50-80 cm in height during the first growing season.
Phenology: Flowering occurs from October to April, fruiting from March to June.
Notes: The type sheet of S. el/liptica at BM has two labels in Brown’s handwriting
attached. One has “Cynanchum glabellum, Brown No. 8, Carpentaria main opp...
Groote Islands” and the other has “Cynanchum, Brown No. 9, Coen River’’. At the
base of the sheet is written ““Secamone elliptica R. Br.” in Brown’s handwriting. There
is no way of telling whether the sheet is a mixed collection of material from two different
localities as there are several discrete pieces of material attached. Hence the piece directly
in the middle of the sheet has been selected to preserve the application of Brown’s name
to an elliptic leaved specimen.
The localities for Cuming’s type collections of S. attenuata and S. multiflora are
taken from the listing of Merrill (1915). The isotype sheets at K of S. attenuata have
‘Prov. Batangus, Luzon’ and of S. multiflora have ‘Prov. Albay, Luzon’ on the labels.
According to Merrill, all of Cuming’s collections were distributed with labels stating
“Ins. Philippinae 1841” although many did not actually come from The Philippines.
According to Merrill (1903), complete sets of Cuming’s collections exist at B (presumably
now destroyed), BM, K and P, with partial sets at G, L and a number of other herbaria.
Warburg (1894) in describing S. papuana did not provide a formal description,
however his sentence “Corona squamae 5, tubo stamineo nune brevis-sime nune alte
adnatae, a latere compressae, apice liberae rectae vel incurvae.” may be construed as a
diagnosis. No specimen was cited and the above collection of Warburg’s which is labelled
“Secamone papuana Warb.” is selected as lectotype.
S. elliptica is a very variable species particularly with respect to leaf length, width
and shape as demonstrated by Figures 1-3. There appears to be no strong geographical
correlation of this leaf variation within Australia, although a greater proportion of
herbarium records from the southern parts of the range tend to have elliptic to narrow-
elliptic leaves. Examination of any population in the field generally reveals branches
with leaves that vary from narrow-elliptic to elliptic to broadly lanceolate-elliptic or
ovate, depending on the conditions of growth. Similarly there is no geographic correlation
of plants with either solitary or compound cymes as can be seen from Figures la and
4a, both from plants in the southern part of the range with elliptic leaves. Some minor
variation in floral characters such as corona size, corona lobe size and shape, pedicel
length, sepal size, corolla size and calycine gland number occurs (Figures 1-3) but this
is no more than occurs in many taxa of Asclepiadaceae and shows no geographical or
ecological correlation. Hence there is little basis on which to recognise 5. ovata, 5S.
elliptica, S. micrantha, S. multiflora, S. attenuata, S. lanceolata, or S. flavida as distinct
species. The name S. elliptica is applied here because, of the earliest two names available
(the other being S. ovata), it has been more commonly used.
Conservation status: The species is widespread and not endangered in any way.
Forster & Harold, Secamone elliptica
Fig. 3. Secamone elliptica: A. \eaf (tip lost) * 1. B.
RR ge ll car qa,
a
‘anor
")
4
wed A
w
Fowha
=, 4
==
=.
=
me
=
he
=
af
=
=
S =
=
=
"be
Pet Ts bot del Bl
dw
¢
44s
. a
PELL? steals
Nirreenaneyt
=
=
a
*
=
5
=
a
a
*
a *
i
single flower X 10. C. flower with gynostegium and corolla
removed showing ovaries and glands at sepal bases X 20. D. apical view of flower X 10. E. apical view of staminal
corona X 40, F. side view of staminal corona with
Stobo AQ440519.
style-head protuding X 40. G. pollinarium x 70. All from
CeO Oe hi eee GOO COOL RCCL CoC Ck COCO LCCC LLCO LCi ee LoL ec CL COL iL Le ce ee ee ee Te eC CTC CCIM. TC TCIiCrrrrrerrrerrrr rc rere rrrerrrcrerrrrrrrr rc Trerrirrrrrirreriirrrrr iter eT eee ee erere rere rrr errr errr err rrrny
rei et
‘enna te
716 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Fig. 4. Secamone elliptica: A. tip of flowering stem with elliptic leaves and much branched cyme X I. B. seedling
x 1. C. follicles X 1. D. seeds X 1. A, Forster 3309; B, Forster 310: Stony Ck, 25°29’S, 131°54’E, C-D, Forster
533: Mt Blandy, 25°24’S, 151°46’E.
Acknowledgements
The Directors of BRI, CANB, DNA, JCT, LAE, MEL, NT, PERTH and QRS
allowed full access to specimens, either at their institutions or on loan. Partial holdings
were allowed on loan from NSW. The Director of L provided information on type
material at that institution. Dr B. Leuenberger (B) provided information on type material
of R. Schlechter held at that institution. Mr L. Pedley (BRI) arranged for the loan of
specimens. Dr G.P. Guymer (BRI) and Dr J.G. West (CANB) whilst Australian Botanical
Liaison Officers at Kew arranged for photographs to be taken of various types. Special
collections were made or arranged by Mesdames C. Cox, A. Gunness, J. Stobo, R.
Tingey and Mr N. Gibson. Some collections were made on various field trips with
Messrs L.H. Bird and M.C. Tucker and Dr M.P. Bolton. The Australian Biological
Resources Study provided partial funding in 1988. Mrs E.M. Ross (BRI) provided
constructive comments on the manuscript. All of this assistance is gratefully acknowledged.
References
BAILEY, F.M. (1900). Secamone. In The Queensland Flora 3: 997-998. Brisbane: Government Printer.
BENTHAM, G. (1869). Secamone. In Flora Australiensis 4: 327-328. London: L. Reeve & Co.
BROWN, R. (1810a). Prodromus Flora Novae Holiandiae et Insulae van Diemen. New York: J. Cramer.
BROWN, R. (1810b). On the Asclepiadeae. [a natural order of plants separated from the Apocineae of Jussieu].
London: R. Brown. [A preprint of Brown [811.]
Forster & Harold, Secamone elliptica
ORT a =
t 7 |
ir :
; 4
: |
|
| ;
|
en
Mr a -
wees
jt 2 ed
ne 2 4
, 7
=
yaaa
ee
T
a2 a
nm :
a “
‘ ee el
enn, el
ee al
cass
35°
USTRALI
be t 3 A
ae" *
Map 1. Distribution of Secamone elliptica in Australia mapped at 1:250 000 grid scale.
BROWN, R. (1811). On the Asclepiadeae, a natural order of plants separated from the Apocineae of Jussieu
Memos of the Wernerian Natural History Society 1: 12-78.
FARR, E.R., LEUSSINK, J.A. & STAFLEU, F.A. (eds) (1979), Index Nominum Genericorum Plantarum. Utrecht/
The Hague: Bohn, Schelterma & Holkema/ Dr. W. Junk Publishers eV.
FORSTER, P.I. (1987). New host records for Euploea core corinna (Macleay) (Nymphalidae). Journal of the
Lepidopterist's Society 41: 354-355.
MABBERLEY, J. (1985). Jupiter Botanicus - Robert Brown of the British Museum. Braunshweig: J. Cramer.
MERRILL, E.D. (1903). Botanical work in the Philippines. Bureau of Agriculture, Bulletin No. 4. Manila: Bureau
of Printing.
MERRILL, E.D. (1915). Genera and species erroneously credited to the Philippine Flora. The Philippine Journal
of Science, C. Botany. 10: 171-194.
PHILLIPS, E.P. (1951). The Genera of South African Flowering Plants. 2nd Edition. Cape Town: Government
Printer.
PURI, V. & SHIAM, R. (1966). Studies in floral anatomy. VII]. Vascular anatomy of the flower of certain species
of the Asclepiadaceae with special reference to corona. dgra University Journal of Research 15: 189-216.
SAFWAT, F.M. (1962). The floral morphology of Secamone and the evolution of the pollinating apparatus in
Asclepiadaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 49: 95-119.
SANKOWSKY,. G. (1975). Some new food plants for various Queensland butterflies. -ustralian Entomological
Magazine 2: 55-56.
SCHEERMEYER, E. & ZALUCKI, M.-P. (1985). Food plant records of Euploea core corinna (W.S. Macleay)
with some notes on larval coloration. Australian Entomological Magazine 11: 87-90.
qT]
78 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
SCHILL, R. & JAKEL, U. (1978). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Asclepiadaceen-Pollinarien. Tropische und subtropische
Pflanzenwelt 22: 1-122.
WARBURG, O. (1894). Plantae Hellwigianae. Beitrag zur Flora von Kaiser Wilhelms-Land. Botanische Jahrbticher
fiir Systematik Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 18: 184-212.
Accepted for publication 10 March 1989
Austrobaileya 3(1): 79-99 (1989) 79
STUDIES IN AUSTRALIAN GRASSES: 4%.
TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURAL STUDIES
IN AUSTRALIAN ANDROPOGONEAE
B.K. Simon
Queensland Herbarium, Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qid 4068
Summary
Eight new species, namely Cymbopogon dependens, Eulalia annua, Ischaemum albovillosum, [. tropicum, Mnesithea
pilosa, Schizachyrium mitchelliana, Thaumastochloa heteromorpha and Vetiyeria rigida are diagnosed and described.
New combinations are Bothriochloa bladhii subsp. glabra based on Andropogon glaber Roxb., Dichanthtum sericeum
subsp. Aumilius based on Dichanthium humilius J. Black, Dichanthtum sericeum subsp. polystachyum based on
Andropogon sericeus var. polystachyus Benth. and Hyparrhenia rufa subsp. altissima based on Hyparrhenta altissima
Stapf. Synonyms created for the first time are Andropogon affinis R. Br., A. chrysatherus F. Muell., A. sericeus
var. mollis Bailey (and names based on these basionyms) under Dichanthium sericeum (R. Br.) A. Camus,
Andropogon sericeus var. geniculatus Bailey and A. sericeus forma micranthus Domin under Dichanthium sericeum
subsp. Aumilius and Hyparrhenia quarrei Robyns under H. Airta (L.) Stapf. Dimeria chloridiformis (Gaudich.)
Schumann & Lauterb. is recognized as the correct name for D. ciliata Merr., Eulalia aurea (Bory) Kunth for E.
fulva (R. Br.) Kunth and &. geniculata Stapf, Mnesithea rottboellioides (R. Br.) Koning & Sosef for Coelorachis
rottboellioides (R. Br.) A. Camus, Mnesithea granularis (L.) Koning & Sosef for Hackelochioa granularis (L.)
Kuntze, Mnesithea annua (Lazarides) Koning & Sosef for Heferopholis annua Lazarides, Mnesithea formosa (R.
Br.) Koning & Sosef for Rottboellia formosa R. Br. and Polytrias diversiflora (Steudel) Nash for P. amaura (Buse)
Kuntze.
As a result of research undertaken for the preparation of the account of Andro-
pogoneae for the Flora of Australia, a number of new species require formal description
and a few nomenclatural changes are necessary. In the following account they are treated
alphabetically by genus. The descriptions of the new species are extracted from the
database of the Andropogoneae compiled for the Flora using the DELTA system (Dallwitz
& Paine 1986).
New Taxa and New Combinations
BOTHRIOCHLOA Kuntze
Bothriochloa bladhii subsp. glabra (Roxb.) B. Simon, comb. nov.
Andropogon glaber Roxb., Fl. ind. 1: 271 (1820); Amphilophis glabra (Roxb.) Stapf
in Prain, Fl. trop. Afr. 9: 174 (1917); Bothriochloa glabra (Roxb.) A. Camus, Ann.
Soc. Linn. Lyon, n.s. 6: 164 (1931). Type: Bengal, India, W. Roxburgh (holo:
BM!(photo BRI,K); itso: K!(photo BRD).
Specimen examined: Queensland. MORETON DISTRICT: Wendy Allison Park, Brisbane, Apr 1977, Bisset B184 &
B185 (BRI).
Work on the genetic barriers of Bothriochloa bladhii (under B. intermedia) (de
Wet & Harlan 1966; Faruqi 1969) has established that this species is capable of crossing
with other species of Bothriochloa and species of the related genera Dichanthium and
Capillipedium. This promiscuous character of B. bladhii has led some workers to use
the biological species concept to unite the three genera taxonomically (de Wet & Harlan
1966). However I have previously given reasons why I do not consider the wisdom of
such a move with respect to Bothriochloa and Dichanthium (Simon 1982), namely the
morphological differences of spikelet shape, the presence or absence of a translucent
mid-line in the rachis internodes and pedicels and differences in phytogeography. The
species Bothriochloa glabra has been sunk under B. bladhii (Faruqi 1969; Clayton &
Renvoize 1982) following the trend of regarding B. bladhii as a very variable species.
Another point of view is that B. glabra is a hybrid between B. bladhti and Capillipedium
parviflorum and furthermore that C. spicigerum 1s the product of a back-cross between
B. glabra and C. parviflorum (de Wet 1987). In view of the fact that B. glabra does not
occur naturally in Australia I feel these assumptions cannot be made. However I also
* continued from Austrobaileya 2(3): 281-283 (1986)
80 Austrobaileya 3(f): 1989
feel that information is lost by placing A. glabra into synonymy with &B. bladhti as the
introduced B. glabra has slightly smaller spikelets (3-3.5 mm long) than the native B. bladhii
(3.5-4 mm long) and always has pitted spikelets whereas this character 1s a fairly rare
feature in B. bladhii. For this reason I propose the rank of subspecies for B. glabra.
Although this entity has been introduced into cultivation a number of times there appears
to be only one record of it having become naturalised. This was in a Brisbane suburban
park near an old plant introduction field station.
CYMBOPOGON Sprengel
Cymbopogon dependens B. Simon, species nova afhnis C. ambiguo A. Camus et C.
procero (R. Br.) Domin sed foliorum laminis ad 3 mm latis, filiformibus vel
perangustis, culmis subtilibus et dependentibus differt. Typus: Katherine Gorge,
Northern Territory, 8 March 1964, 4. Lazarides 7036 (holo: BRI'(2 sheets BRI
139135 & BRI 139136); iso: CANB!,DNA!K'(photo BRDI),MEL!). Fig. 1.
Culms 90-120 cm tall, 3-5-noded below the inflorescence, delicate and drooping,
internodes smooth, glabrous; nodes glabrous. Leaf sheaths longer than the internodes,
smooth, glabrous, not rolling up at maturity. Ligules to 1 mm long. Collar glabrous.
Leaf blades gradually narrowed to the base, flat, smooth above, glabrous, 15-30 cm long,
0.5-2.5 mm wide. Inflorescence occupying more than 1/5 the culm length, 17-25 cm
long, 3-5 cm wide, + interrupted, 3-5-noded, branched to the 3rd degree; inflorescence
branches mostly exceeding the internodes. Spatheoles very narrowly elliptic, glabrous,
smooth, 2-4 mm long, 1.5-—2 mm wide. Peduncle hairy towards the tip, 8-11 mm long,
1/3-1/2 as long as the spatheole. Racemes distinctly hairy, with hairs 4-7 mm long, not
reflexed, 20-25 mm long, 3-5-jointed. Joints and pedicels linear, concave ventrally,
convex on the back, 2-2.5 mm long, ciliate on the margins and villous on the back,
nearly equal. Sessile spikelet 4.5-5 mm long, 5-6 times as long as wide, very narrowly
ovate-elliptic, awned; longer callus hairs to 1.2 mm long. Lower glume flat or concave
on back, ca | mm long, 2-keeled throughout, with 0-4 intracarinal nerves, flat to shallowly
concave. Upper glume 3-nerved. Lower lemma oblong, a little shorter than the glumes.
Upper lemma 3/4 as long as the lower lemma, lobed to I/2 the length. Awn 17-20 mm
long. Column 6-8 mm long. Pedicelled spikelet neuter, narrow linear to narrowly ovate,
ca 2 mm long (rudimentary).
Specimens examined: Western Australia. GARDNER District: Hidden Valley, Kununurra, Pullen 10.84!
(CANB,NSW,PERTH,WIR). Northern Territory. DARWIN AND GULF: Woolaning, Dunlop 5925 & Craven
(CANB,DNA,K,L); 19 mi NE of Katherine, Feb 1965, Hilson 333 (BRI,CANB,DNA,K,L,NSW,US); 4 mi W of
Pine Creek, Lazarides 237 & Adams (CANB,NT); Katherine Gorge, Mar 1980, Simon 3667, Cousins & Grosvenor
(BRI). CENTRAL SoutH: 26 mi NE of Docker River Settlement, Laiz 872 (CANB,DNA).
This species is distinguished from the related C. ambiguus and C. procerus by its
small stature and decumbent or weakly erect habit. It inhabits sandstone cliffs in various
isolated regions of the Northern Territory and Western Australia. The above three species
are closely related, differing only 1n size and direction of culm growth. Some plants of
C. procerus are extremely robust, growing to heights of up to 2.5 m with leaf blades to
{5 mm wide whereas plants of C. dependens may have culms as short as 40 cm and
leaf blades never more than 3 mm wide. The quantitative differences may be a reflection
of the ecology of the habitats where the forms occur. C. procerus grows only in the
monsoon tropical areas of northern Australia; C. ambiguus 1s found in more arid regions
of the Australian subtropics, although collections have also been made in the tropics;
C. dependens has been collected from both tropical and subtropical regions. The differences
in spikelet morphology between C. ambiguus and C. procerus given by Blake (1974)
were not reflected in specimens examined when the Flora of Australia account was being
prepared. It is also interesting that Blake regarded the fragile specimens represented by
Lazarides 7036 and Wilson 333 (placed here with C. dependens) as a diminutive form
of the robust species C. procerus and not of the shorter species C. ambiguus. The close
relationship between C. ambiguus and C. procerus is reflected by the fact that the name
C. exaltatus, a taxonomic synonym of C. procerus, has been misapplied to C. ambiguus
in the past. In order to find the true relationship between these entities experimentation
is required. In the meantime I have decided to recognize them at species rank.
In general the taxonomic situation in Australian species of Cymbopogon is not as
clear as that presented by recent workers (Blake 1974, soenarko 1977). There appear to
be a number of situations of blurring of species boundaries and the existence of hybrids
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae
. One sheet of holotype of Cymbopogon dependens.
82 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
has been postulated. Examples of these have been cited e.g. hybrids between C. refractus
and three other species (C. obtectus, C. bombycinus and C. queenslandicus) cited by
Blake (1974), hybrids between C. ambiguus and C. bombycinus cited by Soenarko (1977)
and a postulated hybrid between C. ambiguus and C. queenslandicus (S.T. Blake 8353A)
from Castle Hill, Townsville, annotated by Blake in the Queensland Herbarium. The
boundary between C. bombycinus and C. obtectus is not clearly demarcated and there
are populations that are intermediate in the interzone between the wetter and drier
regions in which the two species occur. Some specimens which fall into this category
have curled-up old leaf-blades of C. bombycinus but spikelets of C. obtectus (Lloyd
NSW183537 (NSW) from Coonabarabran, N.S.W., Crisp 1542 (AD,CBG,NSW,L,US)
from near West Wyalong, N.S.W., Blake 10742 (BRI,NSW) from Noondoo, Queensland,
Chippendale 1738 (DNA,NSW) from Hamilton Downs, N.T. and 7. & J. Whaite 4159
(NSW) from near Geraldton, W.A.).
DICHANTHIUM Willimet
The Dichanthium sericeum complex, known commonly as Queensland blue grasses,
has been a problem group for some time with regards to its taxonomy (Blake 1969; de
Wet & Harlan 1962; de Wet & Richardson 1963; de Wet & Singh 1964). The similarity
between the entities was recognized by de Wet and Singh (1964) who stated that “these
species appear to form a closely related complex characterized by fasciculate, sessile or
subsessile racemes’. In a taxonomic study of the group Blake (1969) went to some
lengths to justify the recognition of three species D. sericeum, D. affine and D. tenuiculum.
Sega re-examination of type material has resulted in my perceiving the situation to
e as follows:
1. Blake’s “D. affine” really consists of two entities, one of which is a delicate annual
species found in arid inland areas and formerly recognized as D. humilius and
the other, to which the name D. affine has been given, is really a more slender
state of D. sericeurm and found together with the latter species in the black soil
plains of the subtropics.
2. The lectotypes of Dichanthium sericeum and D. affine are from a mixed gathering on
the Paterson River, New South Wales and mounted on a single sheet at BM
(Blake 1969). There is a discernible difference on the sheet between the inflo-
rescence of D. affine (labelled ““A”’ on the sheet) and the other six of D. sericeum,
the former having shorter racemes and awns and smaller spikelets. However the
fact that they were collected in the same gathering may either be a reflection of
phenotypic plasticity or the result of genetic variation of a Mendelian nature. At
this stage therefore I am not giving taxonomic recognition to this more slender
form, but including it within the variability of D. sericeum subsp. sericeum.
3. The tropical entity with many racemes was known as Dichanthium superciliatum
until Blake (1969) made the new combination D. tenuiculum based on an earlier
basionym. When I examined the type of Andropogon tenuiculus Steudel the
presence of only 2-4 racemes led me to believe Blake was wrong in placing this
entity together with the many-racemed D. superciliatum. At the time I thought
the specimen belonged with typical D. sericeum and I placed a det. slip on the
type with this name (at that stage I was calling it D. sericeum var. sericeum),.
However recent field work in tropical Australia and an examination of more
specimens has revealed that raceme number is not a good diagnostic character
for this tropical entity, nor is the other morphological character of the hairs being
arranged in a subapical fringe (de Wet & Harlan 1968) as both taxa display this
character. I have found more reliable distinguishing characters to be habit and
the way the hairs of the subapical fringe are arranged. The tropical entity is
usually a robust annual with the spikelet hairs being arranged in a distinct erect
fashion from the spikelet surface whereas typical D. sericeum 1s always a perennial,
sometimes fairly delicate, and the spikelet hairs are not as distinctively erect from
the spikelet surface. The type of Andropogon tenuiculus has no base and so it
was not possible to tell its habit; the erect hairs and the fact that it was collected
from the tropical Philippines however, has persuaded me to follow Blake’s original
placing of this entity. A physiological difference between the two has been noted
(Tothill 1977, 1981) in that the tropical entity flowers under short-day conditions
late in the season whereas D. sericeum sens. Strict. is day-neutral. Tothill postulates
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae 83
speciation of the latter from the former as an evolutionary development away
from short-day contro! of flowering in a similar manner to that in some other
members of the Andropogoneae in their southern migration.
4, Although the taxa of the D. sericeum complex are fairly well genetically isolated (de
Wet & Harlan 1968), there exist in herbarium collections specimens of an
intermediate nature which are difficult to place with certainty into one taxon or
another. In view of this dilemma it seems to me that the most satisfactory
nomenclatural solution at this stage is to treat the whole complex as one species,
with three subspecies in the manner outlined formally. At an earlier stage in my
studies I selected the varietal rank to separate “D. affine” (in the Blake sense)
from D. sericeum, whereas the decision to use the subspecies rank for D. tenuiculum
was taken at the outset.
With the establishment of D. affine as a synonym of D. sericeum subsp. sericeum,
the full synonymy for D. sericeum becomes:
Dichanthium sericeum (R. Br.) A. Camus, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris) 27: 549 (1921);
Andropogon sericeus R. Br., Prodr. 201 (1810). Type: Paterson R., N.S.W., &.
Brown [6178, excl. part A] (lecto: BM!(photo BRI,K); isolecto: E!(photo
ag ara & fragment BRI), fide S.T. Blake, Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland
80: 67 (1
Dichanthium sericeum subsp. sericeum
Andropogon affinis R. Br., Prodr. 201 (1810); Sorghum affine (R. Br.) Kuntze, Revis.
gen. pl. 2: 791 (1891); Dichanthium affine (R. Br.) Camus, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat.
(Paris) 27: 549 (1921). Type: Paterson R., N.S.W., R. Brown [6178, part A] (lecto:
BM!(photo BRI,K); isolecto: E!(fragment BRI, photo BRLK),K\(photo BRI), fide
S.T. Blake, /oc. cit.).
Andropogon iat ated F. Muell., Linnaea 25: 443 (1853). Type: Crystal Brook,
S.A., F. Mueller s.n. (syn: MEL!(fragment & photo BRD),P!(fragment BRI, photo
BRLK),S!(fragment BRI, photo BRI,K),W!(photo BRI); towards Rocky Creek,
S.A., F. Mueller s.n. (syn: MEL!(photo BRI),P!,S!).
Andropogon acutiusculus Hackel in DC., Monogr. phan. 6: 975 (1889); Dichanthium
acutiusculum (Hackel) A. Camus, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris) 27: 549 (1921).
Type: Port I Keppel Bay [Between Curtis Island and Facing Island, Qld], &.
Brown [6178 in part] (holo: W, n.v.(photo BRI); iso: BM!(photo BRI,K),BRI',E!,K!
(photo BRI),MEL!,P!(photo BRI)).
Andropogon sericeus var. mollis Bailey, Queensland Agric. J. 30: 316 (1913); Dichan-
thium sericeum var. molle (Bailey) de Wet & Harlan, Phyton 18: 13 (1962). Type:
Gindie, E.W. Bick 12 (holo: BRI!; iso: K!(photo BRI),MEL’).
Andropogon sericeus forma glaberrimus Domin, Bibhoth. Bot. 85: 267 (1915). Type:
Barcaldine, Qld, March 1910, K. Domin s.n. (syn: n.v.), Mareeba, Qld, K. Domin
s.n. (syn: K!(photo BRI).
Andropogon sericeus forma puberulus Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 85: 267 (1915). Type:
Chillagoe, Qld, February 1910, K. Domin s.n. (?holo: K!(photo BRI).
Andropogon sericeus forma ciliatus Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 85: 267 (1915). Type:
Jericho, Qld, February 1910, K. Domin s.n. (?holo: K!(photo BRI)).
Dichanthium caricosum subvar. racemosum Roberty, Boissiera 9: 165 (1960). Type:
Jericho, Qld, R. Simmons 69 (holo: G!(fragment BRI, photo BRIK); so: NSW).
[Andropogon annulatus auct. non Forssk.: F. Muell., Fragm. 8: 123 (1873)].
Dichanthium sericeum subsp. humilius (J. Black) B. Simon, comb. nov.
Dichanthium humilius J. Black, Trans. & Proc. Roy. Soc. South Australia 60: 164
(1936); Andropogon annulatus var. ?humilis Benth., Fi. austral. 7: 531 (1878).
Type: Charlotte Waters, N.T., March 1875, &. Giles s.n. (holo: MEL!(photo BRI)).
Andropogon sericeus var. geniculatus Bailey, Queensland Agric. J. 26: 128 (1911).
synon. nov. Type: Winton, Qld, February 1914, T.G. Wright s.n. (holo: BRI; iso:
CANB!,K!(photo BRI),MEL!).
84 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Andropogon sericeus forma micranthus Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 85: 267 (1915) synon.
nov. Type: Between Winton and Barcaldine, March 1910, K. Domin s.n. (holo:
PR fide Blake (1969), n.y.).
Specimens examined: Western Australia. COOLGARDIE District: 40 km E of Mt Vetters Station, Kalgoorlie, Apr
1975, Mitchell sn. (NSW,PERTH). CARNARVON District: 94 km N of Minilya, Mar 1980, Simion 3783 & Stretch
(BRI). Austin District: Wiluna, July 1937, Afelville s.n. (PERTH). HaLt District: Fox River Station, Ma
1981, Glover FR 7 (BRI). Northern Territory. BARKLAY TABLELAND: Rockhampton Downs, Apr 1968, Nicholls
790 (BRI,DNA). CENTRAL NorRTH: Claraville Homestead, Jan 1971, Latz 1152 (BRI,DNA). CENTRAL SOUTH:
Andado Station, Apr 1977, Latz 6775 (BRI,DNA). South Australia. LAKE Eyre: Wangianna, Sep 1941, Cleland
s.n. (BRI). FLINDERS RANGES: 16 km NNE of Wooltana, Apr 1966, Eichler 18637 (AD,BRI). Queensland. BURKE
District: 40 mi SSW of Richmond, Jun 1954, Lazarides 4458 (BRI,CANB). GREGORY NORTH DISTRICT:
Currawilla, Jun 1949, Everist 3910 (BRI,K). New South Wales. NorTH WESTERN PLAINS: ‘Near Fort Bourke, Apr
1976, Simon 2959 (BRILL.NSW,K).
_ Dichanthium sericeum subsp. polystachyum (Benth.) B. Simon, comb. nov.
Andropogon sericeus var. polystachyus Benth., Fl. austral. 7: 530 (1878). Type:
Burdekin River, Qld, FE. Bowman s.n. (lecto (here designated): K!(photo BRI):
isolecto: MEL!(photo BRI)).
Andropogon tenuiculus Steudel, Syn. Pl. Glum. 1: 371 (1854); Dichanthium tenui-
culum (Steudel) S.T. Blake, Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland 80: 69 (1969). Type:
Luzon, Philippines, H. Cuming 1398 (holo: P!\(photo BRI); iso FI, 7.v.(fragment
& photo BRI), W, n.v.(photo BRJ)).
Andropogon superciliatus Hackel, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 6: 239 Sauce Sorghum super-
ciliatum (Hackel) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. 792 (1891); Dichanthium superciliatum
(Hackel) A. Camus, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris) 27: 550 (1921). Type: Near
Atapupu, Timor, Naumann s.n. (holo: B, fide Blake (1969) 1.Y.).
Specimens examined: Papua New Guinea. Port Moressy District: Port Moresby, 1893, FE. Cowley 16 (BRI).
Australia. Western Australia. FITzGERALD DisTRict: Kimberley 88 Outcamp, road to Mindewinde, Apr 1988,
Simon 4048 & Sands (BRI,CANB,DNA,K,MEL,NSW,PERTH). GARDNER District: 100 km SE of Kununurra,
Mar 1979, Petherami 322 (BRI,K,PERTH). Hatt District: Fox River Station, Mar 1981, Glover FR | (BRI.
Northern Territory. VICTORIA RIVER: Kidman Springs, Apr 1980, Andrew 616 (BRLCANB,DNA), DARWIN AND
GULF: Austral Downs, May 1947, Blake 17972 (AD, BRI,CANB,DNA,K,MEL,NSW,PERTH). BARKLY TABLELAND:
Newcastle Waters, May 1975, Latz 5989 (BRI,DNA). CENTRAL NORTH: 16 Mile Creek, N of Alice Springs, Feb
1971, Nelson 2085 (BRI,DNA). Queensland. Cook District: 11 km E of Meripah, May 1987, Clarkson 7158 &
Simon (BRI,LMBA,NSW). BurKE DISTRICT: Hughenden, Jun 1934, Blake 6248 (BRILCANB,NSW,PERTH).
GREGORY NorTH District: Tranby, May 1936, Blake 11429 (BRI). NORTH KENNEDY District: Antil Creek,
Mar 1973, Henderson 1422 (BRI). SouTH KENNEDY DISTRICT: Mackay, Nov 1963, Glover s.n. (BRI). MITCHELL
District: Cameron Downs, Mar 1943, Pearson 163 (BRI).
EULALIA Kunth
EKulalia annua B. Simon, species nova affinis FE. aureae (Bory) Kunth sed habitu annuo,
culmis caespitosis infirme interdum decumbentibus differt. Typus: 7 km N of
North Kennedy R. on Peninsular Development Road, Cape York Peninsula,
Queensland, 28 April 1983, J.R. Clarkson 4802 (holo: BRI!; iso: CANBI,
K!,MBA!,NSW!,QRS)). Fig. 2.
Habit annual. Culms 10-45 cm tall, decumbent to weakly tufted, sometimes decumbent,
glabrous at base, simple; nodes glabrous. Ligule a hair-fringed membrane, ca 0.1 mm
long. Blades 3~7 cm long, 1-3 mm wide. Inflorescence subdigitate, or digitate. Peduncles
hairy. Racemes 2 or 3, with dark brown hairs, 7—-20-jointed, 1.5-4 cm. Joints and pedicels
the same length, densely fulvous, 1.8 mm long. Spikelet dorsally compressed, lanceolate-
linear; 2.5-3 mm long, ca 0.6 mm wide: callus ca 0.3 mm long. Lower glume very
narrowly truncate, lanceolate-linear, rounded on back, membranous to thinly chartaceous,
with long fulvous hairs on lower half on back (larger towards tip), reddish brown, 5-
nerved (very faint). Upper glume 3-nerved (faint), as long as lower glume, linear-
lanceolate, thinly fulvous on back. Lower lemma absent. Upper lemma stipe-like, ca 0.5
mm long. Awn 18-20 mm long.
Specimens examined: Northern Territory, DARWIN AND GULE: Munmarlary, May 1978, Dunlop 4805
(BRI,CANB,DNA,K,NT); Munmarlary, Apr 1973, Latz 3870 (BRI,;CANB,DNA,L); Kakadu National Park,
Lazarides 8842 (CANB,MEL,NSW):; Hempe Bay, Groote Eylandt, May 1948, Specht 384 (BRI.MEL,NSW,PERTH);
Melville Island, Apr 1986, Johnson 4218 (BRI); Darwin, Allen 183 and 466 (BRI): Darwin, 1881, Burkitt s.n.
(BRI,MEL). Queensland. Cook District: Merepah, May 1987, Clarkson 7154 & Simon (BRI,DNA,K,L,
MBA,NSW,PERTH,QRS); Lakefield National Park, May 1987, Clarkson 6964 & Simon (BRI.K,L,MBA,NSW,QRS):
30 km N of Mareeba, May 1975, Simon 2652A, Clarkson & Staples (BRI,CANB,K); Bamaga, May 1981, Alcorn
8172 (BRI); ditto, 8172 (BRI); York Downs, May 1981, Morton 1209 (BRI,MEL). BURKE DISTRICT: Normanton,
Gulliver [BRI280496] (BRI,MEL).
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae 5
PP PPE
Onecabeate een. — ayes! cadena ot oe -
BRISSB
2
Fig. 2. Holotype of Eulalia annua.
86 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
This annual grass has been in herbarium collections for some time, having been
wrongly identified as Eulalia leschenaultiana (Decne) Ohwi, applicable to a decumbent
Asian perennial species and Pseudopogonatherum collinum (Balansa) A. Camus, a
synonym of P. contortum (Brongn.) A. Camus. The genera Eulalia and Pseudopogon-
atherum have recently been combined (Clayton & Renvoize 1986) on the basis that the
character of rachis toughness, implied by them to have been used as the diagnostic
character to keep the genera apart, breaks down. However at least three other characters
known to separate Pseudopogonatherum from Eulalia are the distinctly awned upper
glume (awnless in Eulalia), both spikelets of each pair being pedicelled (one sessile in
Eulalia) and the convex lower glume (concave in Eulalia). The new species is typically
Eulalia in all these characters.
HYPARRHENIA Andersson ex Fourn.
Hyparrhenia rufa subsp. altissima (Stapf) B. Simon, comb. nov.
Andropogon altissimus Hochst. ex A. Braun, Flora 24: 277 (1841), non Raspail
(1825), nec Colla (1836); Hyparrhenia altissima Stapf in Prain, Fl. trop. Afr. 9:
307 (1918). Type: Ethiopia, plants cultivated at Karlsruhe from seed collected by
Schimper (holo: n.v.; iso: K!(photo BRI)).
Andropogon fulvicomus var. approximatus Hochst. in Sched., Schimp. iter abyssicum
exs. 2: 928 (1842). Type: holo: 7.v.; iso: K(photo BRI).
Specimens examined: Queensland. Cook District: Malanda, Jun 1963, Johnston [AQ262567] (BRI). NortTH
KENNEDY District: Near Ingham, Jun 1952, Everist 5172 (BRI). New South Wales. NortH Coast: Maitland,
Vane {NSW67/401] (NSW); Newcastle, MfcLennan {NSW183563] (NSW); Raymond Terrace, Mar 1981, Lloyd 368
(BRI); Belmont, Jun 1986, Lioyd 412 (BRI); ditto, May 1986, Lioyd 413, (BRI,CANB); ditto, Jun 1986, Lloyd
415 (BRI, PERTH); Doyalson, Jun 1986, Lloyd 411 (AD,BRI); Jun 1986, ditto 414 (BRI,NSW); Sandgate, NW
of Newcastle, Story 7588 (CANB, 3 sheets).
According to the most recent revision of Hyparrhenia (Clayton 1969) there are
four species in Australia — H. rufa, H. hirta, H. quarrei and H. filipendula. The first three
are thought to be naturalized exotics, whereas H. filipendula has a distribution pattern
exhibited by some other Old World andropogonoid species, namely Themeda triandra
and Heteropogon contortus. Clayton (1969) regards H. rufa as a very variable species
and he lists ten characters with “no obvious discontinuities.”” Within Australia however,
the forms with villous peduncles appear to have a more pallid colour of the spikelet
indumentum, as well as a different distribution from the more common form with
glabrous peduncles and reddish brown spikelet indumentum. For these reasons taxonomic
recognition at subspecific rank seems appropriate to me. The subspecies is allopatric
from the typical subspecies (within Australia) and is known to occur in the Newcastle
area of New South Waies and in northern coastal Queensland.
Hyparrhenia quarrei Robyns is separated from H. hirta by Clayton on the basis
of the racemes being deflexed and he cites two specimens from Australia, one from
Western Australia and the other from New South Wales. Examination of these specimens
has revealed them to fall within the circumscription of H. hirta and that raceme deflection
is probably a function of age rather than by anything fixed genetically. The type of H.
quarrei does not show raceme deflection very well anyway, being a young specimen, and
supports my view of placing H. quarrei in synonymy.
Hyparrhenia hirta (L.) Stapf in Prain, Fl. trop. Afr. 9: 315 (1918). Andropogon hirtus
L., Sp. PL: 1046 (1753). Type: Italy, Burser 1.119 (holo: UPS, fide Clayton 1969,
n.V.).
Hyparrhenia quarrei Robyns, Fl. Agrost. Belge 1:171 (1921), synon. nov. Type: Zaire,
Kafubu, P. Quarre 199 (holo: BR!(photo BRLK)).
Robyns, Bull. Jard. Bot. Brux. 8: 234 (1930).
ISCHAEMUM L.
Ischaemum albovillosum B. Simon species nova affinis J. fragili R. Br. sed gluma superna
spiculae sessilis acuminata et hirsuta, gluma inferna spiculae sessilis hirsuta, palea
inferna absenti differt, et affinis J. roseotomentoso Phipps sed pilis albis, gluma
8/
AUSTRALIA PROJECT
EA
=
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae
Fig. 3. Holotype of Jschaemum albovillosum
88 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
inferna spiculae sessilis sine dente centrali differt. Typus: Hamersley Railway line,
between Dampier and Mt Tom Price, Western Australia, October 1968, Campion
sn. [PERTH 00349925] (holo: PERTH!(photo BRI)). Fig. 3.
Habit perennial. Culms to 40 cm tall, densely to loosely tufted, simple: nodes usually
bearded. Ligule ca | mm long (imperceptibly hair-fringed). Blades 5-12 cm long; 2-5
mm wide. Inflorescence single. Racemes !10-12-jointed, 6-8 cm long. Joints shorter than
pedicels, with ciliate margins, ca 5 mm long. Sessile spikelet dorsally compressed, elliptic,
ca 10 mm long, ca 2 mm wide. Lower glume not rugose, coriaceous, glabrous outside,
hairy towards apex inside, erose, 9-nerved, 2-keeled, without wings at apex. Upper glume
d-nerved, ca 9 mm long, acuminate, hairy inside and on keel outside, coriaceous. Lower
lemma hyaline. Lower palea absent. Upper lemma stipe-like, ca 5 mm long, membranous.
Awn to 30 mm long. Upper palea absent. Anthers ca 1 mm long. Grain ca 2.5 mm
long. Pedicelled spikelet ca 10 mm long, elliptic, developed. Lower glume coriaceous,
hirsute with long tubercle-based hairs especially on keels and subapical arch, 15-17-
nerved. Upper glume 2/3 as long as lower glume, glabrous, acute, 11-nerved. Lower
lemma ca 6 mm long. Upper lemma ca 5 mm long.
Thus far the new species is only represented by the holotype.
This very distinctive species resembles J. roseotomentosum from Zimbabwe in
that it has a single raceme, the lower floret of the sessile spikelet is sterile and the
corresponding spikelets are about the same size. J. albovillosum differs from I. roseoto-
mentosum in that the tomentum of the young inflorescence is white and not mauvish
pink and the lower glume of the sessile spikelet does not have broad wings with a central
tooth at the apex. Both species differ from J. fragile in the larger spikelets and the silky
tomentum.
Ischaemum tropicum B. Simon, species nova affinis J. po/ystachyo Presl sed inflorescentiis
racemis duobus vel tribus, culmis erectis differt, et affinis J. afro (J. Gmelin)
Dandy sed inflorescentiis racemis duobus vel tribus, spiculis parvioribus
differt, et affinis J. timorensi Kunth sed _ spiculis grandioribus differt.
Typus: NW of Katherine, Northern Territory, 26 April 1947, S.T.Blake 17475
(holo: BRI; iso: CANB!,DNA!,K).LI,MEL! |NSW!). Fig. 4.
Habit perennial. Culms 80-120 cm tall, densely to loosely tufted, shortly rhizomatous,
simple, nodes hairy. Ligule ca 2 mm long (rim of hairs). Leaves glabrous; blades 8-20 _
cm long, 2-4 mm wide. Inflorescence digitate. Racemes 2 or 3; pedunculate (upper), 8-
[4-jointed, 4-6 cm long. Peduncles 6-7 mm long; slightly hairy on margins. Joints longer
than pedicels, with ciliate margins, ca 4.5 mm long, triangular in section, base of joint
and pedicel producing a pore. Sessile spikelet triangular in section, elliptic, 5~5.5 mm
long, 1.5-2 mm wide. Lower glume elliptic-acute, not rugose, glabrous, chartaceous, bifid
(obscurely), 10-nerved, 2-keeled, with wings at apex; wings narrow. Upper glume acu-
minate (obscurely with awn to 2 mm long), glabrous, coriaceous, 4-nerved. Lower lemma
acute, glabrous, ca 6 mm long. Lower palea slightly shorter, hyaline. Upper lemma ca
> mm long, hyaline, bifid with linear lobes, bifid for 1/3 of length. Awn 12-16 mm long.
Upper palea lanceolate, ca 5 mm long. Anthers ca 2.5 mm long. Pedicelled spikelet
neuter, 2~7 mm long, elliptic, developed or reduced to 1 or 2 glumes. Lower glume
glabrous, not rugose below, coriaceous, 11-nerved. Upper glume subequal, acuminate,
glabrous, 7-nerved. Lower lemma acute, ca 5.5 mm long. Lower palea equal. Upper
lemma ca 5 mm long; awned. Palea ca 5.5 mm long. Anthers ca 1 mm long.
Specimens examined: Papua New Guinea. Morose District: Near Lae, Apr 1975, Henty NGF 49749
(A,BRI,CANB,L). Australia. Northern Territory, DARWIN AND GULF: George Creek near Robins Falls, S of
Adelaide River, Lazarides 252 & Adams (CANB,DNA,K,L); Robins Falls, Mar 1972, Passlow 270 (BRI).
Queensland. COOK District: Moa Peak, Moa Island, Aug 1985, Budworth 305 (BRI).
This is a fairly distinctive grass with affinities with the Malesian species J.
polystachyum Pres| and I. timorense Kunth and the African species J. afrum (J. Gmelin)
Dandy in that there is a distinct pore at the junction of the rachis joint and the pedicel.
This feature is not present in any other Australian species but is fairly common in
species of other regions.
89
ogoneae
*
ian Androp
Simon, Austral
.
Cu
otype of Ischaemum tropli
|
Ho
*
90 Austrobatleya 3(1): 1989
MNESITHEA Kunth
Mnesithea pilosa B. Simon, species nova affinis 4. formosae (R. Br.) Koning & Sosef
sed sine fimbria ciliata ad apicem articuli rhachidis, spiculis sessilis longioribus,
spiculis pedicellis rudimentalissimis differt. Typus: Bottom C Paddock, Swans
oo Queensland, 24 March 1983, P. Chaplain [AQ349053] (holo: BRI). Figs
5 &
Habit annual. Culms 25-30 cm tall, erect, branched; nodes hairy. Ligule ca 1 mm long.
Blades 3-6 cm long, 1-3 mm wide. Inflorescence single (rarely with 2 spikelet pairs at
a node). Racemes 1, pedunculate, 5-10-jointed, 1-4 cm. Peduncles glabrous, 2-3 mm
long. Joints and pedicels the same length (fused to halfway), glabrous, 3-5 mm long:
pedicel rigid and 3-nerved. Sessile spikelet dorsally compressed or terete, ovate, 2-3.5
mm long, 1.3-2 mm wide. Lower glume ovate, rounded on back, indurated, pilose,
rugose (slightly), 11-nerved (indistinctly), 2-keeled, without wings at apex. Upper glume
+ equal to lower glume, ovate, glabrous, membranous, not mucronate, 5-nerved. Lower
lemma elliptic-acute, glabrous. Lower palea absent. Upper lemma narrowly elliptic, as
long as upper glume, membranous. Upper palea elliptic, slightly shorter than its lemma.
Anthers | mm long. Pedicelled spikelet neuter, much shorter than sessile spikelet (reduced
to a glume fragment 0.5 mm long).
This grass, so far known only by the type, was originally thought to belong to the
genus Thaumastochloa. However the presence of a rudimentary pedicelled spikelet
necessitated it be moved to the genus Mnesithea, recently enlarged by the amalgamation
of a number of genera of the informal groups Rottboelliastrae of Stapf and Coelorachi-
dastrae of Clayton (Veldkamp, de Koning & Sosef 1986).
SCHIZACHYRIUM Nees
Schizachyrium mitchelliana B. Simon, species nova affinis S. pachyarthro C. Gardner
sed ligulis longioribus, inflorescentia ramis lateralibus multis differt. Typus: Mitch-
ell River Station, Admiralty Gulf, Western Australia, Nov/Dec 1973, 7. Kubicki
53 (holo: PERTH!). Fig. 7.
Ligule ca 3 mm long. Spatheoles involute towards tip, glabrous, 1.8-3 cm long, 3-4 mm
wide. Peduncles 3-5 mm long. Racemes 1-—1.5 cm long. Joints and pedicels + equal to
sessile spikelet; joints diffusely hairy, with hairs longer towards apex, narrowly cuneate
with parallel sides, ca 0.1 mm wide at base, ca 0.5 mm wide at tip. Sessile spikelet
dorsally compressed, narrowly ovate to narrowly ovate-oblong, ca 4 mm long, ca | mm
wide, 4 times as long as wide. Callus ca 0.1 mm long. Lower glume 2-keeled throughout,
narrowly winged, flattened, glabrous. Upper glume 1-nerved. Lower lemma as long as
to shorter than glumes. Upper lemma awn ca 2 mm long. Anthers ca 1.5 mm long.
Pedicelled spikelet ca 2 mm long (reduced to glumes). Awn {0-12 mm long.
This species is thus far known only by the type, which itself is rather fragmentary
in that most of the spikelets have broken up and only five inflorescences are present.
However, the general form of the inflorescence is so very different from other Australian
species of Schizachyrium and the locality of the Mitchell Plateau has and is revealing
many new taxa of plants. Further collecting 1n the area is required to collect better
material of this species.
THAUMASTOCHLOA CLE. Hubb.
Thaumastochloa heteromorpha B. Simon, species nova affinis 7. pubescenti (Benth.) C.E.
Hubb. sed spiculis heteromorphis (laevibus, areolatis vel semiareolatis) differt.
Typus: Cabbage Tree Creek on road from Laura to Cooktown, Lakefield National
Park, Cape York Peninsula, Queensland, 5 May 1987, Clarkson 6940 & B.K.
Simon (holo: BRI'!; 1s0o: K!,L!;MBA!,NSW!,PERTHI!,QRS!). Figs 8 & 9.
Culms 20-55 cm tall, nodes 6-9. Sheaths 0.8-1.5 cm long, pilose. Blades 1.5-8 cm
long, 1-2 mm wide, linear, flat to involute, pilose. Peduncle glabrous, 10-20 mm long
or 60-85 mm long, erect to recurved, to erect, straight. Spikes heteromorphous, with
spikelets alternating in 2 rows or + in | row, cylindrical to constricted, 1-2 cm long,
i-1.5 mm wide, or ca 0.5 mm wide, 5- or 6-jointed, or 2- or 3-jointed. Joints 3-4 mm
long; articulation straight or oblique. Spikelets 2.5-3 mm long. Lower glume triangular-
91
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae
|
Fig. 5. Holotype of Mnesithea pilosa.
92 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
oblong, convex (slightly), rugulose or smooth, 5-7-nerved (obscurely). Upper lemma
nerved.
Specimens examined: Q d. Cook District: 19 ml E of Mt Garnet, May 1967, D.E. Symon 4883
(AD,BRI,CANB): N et “hillazoe, gies 1938, Blake 13604 (BRI, CANB): track to Koolburra, Apr 1980, Clarkson
3146 (BRI,CANB,MBA): 40 ml NW of Mungana, Apr 1938, Blake 13738 (BRI); Fairview to Kimba road, Apr
1980, Clarkson 3176 (BRI,CANB,K,MBA,NSW,QRS): Jardine River, Brass 18880, in part (CANB).
=
mastochloa major S.T. Blake and T. ‘pubescens (Be th.) c rAUDE
taxon en one of these species) or a distinct species (de | S
me specimens have a greater representation of areolate than
1983). SO] 0 : if
nore others do not, suggesting some form of introgression is of erating. Som h
ea wi pagans spikelets pe ony Siig) tly narrower than spikes witl | areolate spikelets,
p wi! ck some spikelets are
‘ z have mt weakly areolate Sens
WESP he i widieation that this iakan shows evidence eet 0 : t
rehire and 7. major it is |
name until experim |
ma and th arte flatly careful
it 1s faily ea sy 10 1 mak mixed gathering. A slapper camer literature (Hi bbard
Thursday Island in | June 189
Aneieiseia and a numb
mub bard re ef ers to tb le an V er - elu me OD de1I ng
rig. 6. Two inflorescences of Mnesithea pilosa (holotype).
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae
Fig. 7. Holotype of Schizachyrium mitchelliana.
1989
: aera
~
ee
Nene
ol
NI Ne, CFR tee
=
eo
Peat aap
Austrobaileya 3(1)
;
i
Ap S904
4 I
;
3 f
4 ui
ras 4 ba
‘ 4
1
i
=
peters tenet naa
Pee ee
saeaparigiinon:
. Holotype of Thaumastochloa heteromorpha.
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae 95
Fig. 9. Inflorescence of spikelets of 7. heteromorpha: A. with smooth lower glumes (holotype); B. with areolate
lower glumes (holotype).
ria rigida B. Simon, species nova afhnis V. y filipiti (Benth.) C.E. ] lub. | sed r racemis
brevioribus eorum articulis crassioribus multo brevioribus differt. Typus:
River crossing on M Arukun road, Cape York Pennisi, Q
May 1982, J.R ~ Clarkson 4419 (holo: BRI!; iso: CANB!
Culms Senncly tufted, 130-150 cm tall, 3- or 4- noded, branched. Blades 30-50 cm long,
3-5 mm wide. Inflorescence 20-27 cm long, 8-10 cm wide, with branches in whorls of
3-5, 0.5-1 cm long. Racemes 3- or 4-jointed, 3-4.5 cm long. Joints 4-11 mm long, twice
as long as pedicels, both scaberulous upwards and filiform. Sessile spikelet lanceolate-
linear, acute, 6-9 mm long. Lower glume srtilagiious, scaberulous, muricate on nerves,
3- nerved. Upper glume 3-nerved, as long as lower glume, boat-shaped, muricate on keel
otherwise smooth. Awn to 2.5 mm long. Lower lemma ca 6 mm long, oblanceolate,
hyaline. Upper lemma stipe-like, ca 2 mm long, bifid. Awn 8- 10 mm long. Palea
lanceolate, ca 2.5 mm long. Grain ca 3.5 mm long. Pedicelled spikelet neuter, 4-) mm
long, linear-lanceolate. Lower glume 3-nerved. Upper glume a little shorter. Lower lemma
ca 3 mm long. Upper lemma ca 2 mm long.
Specimen examined: Queensland. Cook District: York Downs on Myall Creek, May 1981, Morton 1198
(BRL. MEL) (specimen originally selected as type and annotated as such but superseded by the one selected here).
Blake 1944), V. intermedia was separated from V. filipes
imilar to the one above. An examination of the type
imen could not eaalty be separated from V.
placed in synonymy with it. In more
and deserves recognition.
1989
Austrobaileya 3(1)
ida.
lg
a)
*
lverla r
Holotype of Vet
10
96
Fig.
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae 97
Nomenclatural Changes
As a result of some of my recent revisional work in some genera and study of
type material of Andropogoneae from European herbaria during a recent visit to Kew,
a few Australian species of this tribe require different names from those by which they
were formerly known. It seems a useful exercise to list them here as it may be some
time before the formal Flora of Australia account is published.
1. Dimeria chloridiformis (Gaudich.) Schumann & Lauterb., Fl. Schutzgeb. Sudsee 165
(1901).
Andropogon chloridiformis Gaudich. in Freyc., Voy. Uranie 412 (1826). Type: Guam,
M.C. Gaudichaud s.n. (holo: P!(photo BRI,K)).
Dimeria ciliata Merr., Philipp. J. Sci. 9: 262 (1914). Type: Palawan, Phillippines,
E.D. Merrill 9320 (holo: n.¥.; iso: K!(photo BRI)).
Dimeria chloridiformis has previously been kept separate from D. ciliata on the
basis of the pubescent foliage and rachis, and on having larger spikelets (Reeder 1948).
I do not consider the former character adequate for specific dilimitation whereas the
reported spikelet size difference was not apparent from examination of the types.
2. Eulalia aurea (Bory) Kunth, Revis. gramin. 1: 359 (1830).
Andropogon aureum Bory, Voy. iles Afrique 1: 367, t. 21 (1804); Pogonatherum
aureum (Bory) Roberty, Boissiera 9: 391 (1960). Type: Reunion, /.B.G.M. Bory
de Saint-Vincent s.n. (holo: P!(photo BRI,K)).
Saccharum fulvum R. Br., Prodr. 203 (1810); Erianthus fulvus (R. Br.) Kunth, Revis.
eramin. 1: 160 (1829); Pollinia fulva (R. Br.) Benth., Fl. austral. 7: 526 (1878);
Eulalia fulva (R. Br.) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. 2: 775 (1891). Type: Island c [Allen
Island, Carpentaria, Queensland], R. Brown [Iter Australiense 6186] (lecto (here
chosen): BM!(photo BRI,K); isolecto: K!(Qphoto BRI)).
Eulalia geniculata Stapf in Prain, Fl. trop. Afr. 9: 101 (1917). Type: Zaire, Homble
42 (syn: K!); Zimbabwe, Craster 18 (syn: K!); Rogers 4088 (syn: K!); Eyles 1137
(syn: K!).
The African species Eulalia geniculata and the Mascarene species EL. aurea were
formerly regarded as separate from each other and from the Australian FE. ful/va. They
were first placed together by Clayton and Renvoize (1982), who stated “there is consid-
erable variation in such characters as leaf-width, habit, raceme hairiness, and raceme
number, but the spikelet structure, particularly the shape of the lower glume, is constant.
A number of loosely defined and intergrading variants may be recognized, but it 1s an
exaggeration of their differences to treat them as separate species.” Following an exam-
ination of the types I concur with this view and the whole complex is best regarded as
one variable Old World species of the same nature as Hyparrhenia filipendula and
Themeda triandra.
3. Mnesithea Kunth
As a result of recent work on the generic limits of Rottboellia and its allies
(Veldkamp, de Koning & Sosef 1986), I have decided to follow this treatment and place
a number of Australian taxa in the genus Mnesithea. Although their solution is far from
ideal (as they say “clearly the last word has not been said”’), 1t represents an advance
on the understanding of the relationships of these taxa and is a compromise solution
for the time being. Only when further information from sources other than morphology
is available will stability be attained.
The nomenclatural details are as follows:
i) Mnesithea rottboellioides (R. Br.) Koning & Sosef, Blumea 31: 291 (1986).
Ischaemum rottboellioides R. Br., Prodr. 205 (1810); Andropogon rottboellioides (R.
Br.) Steudel, Syn. pl. glumac. 1: 382 (1855); Rottboellia rottboellioides (R. Br.)
Druce, Bot. Soc. Exch. Club Brit. Isles Rep. 1916: 644 (1917); Coelorachis
rottboellioides (R. Br.) A. Camus, Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon 68: 197 (1921). Type:
98 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Gulf of Carpentaria, North Coast, R. Brown [Iter Australiense 6156] (holo:
BM'(photo BRI,K); iso: K!(fragment BRI),MEL!(photo BRI),NSW!(photo BRI)).
Rottboellia ophiuroides var. commutata Hackel in DC., Monogr. phan. 6: 304 (1889).
Type: Etheridge R., Queensland, F. Mueller s.n. (holo: W!(fragment & photo BRI,
photo K)).
11) Mnesithea granularis (L.) Koning & Sosef, Blumea 31: 295 (1986).
Cenchrus granularis L., Mant. pl. altera 2: 575 (1771); Manisuris granularis (L.)
L.f., Nov. gram. gen.: 37 (1779); Hackelochloa granularis (L.) Kuntze, Revis. gen.
pl. 2: 776 (1891); Rottboellia granularis (L.) Roberty, Boissiera 9: 79 (1960). Type:
“India orientalis” (holo: LINN\(LINN 1217.12)).
iii) Mnesithea annua (Lazarides) Koning & Sosef, Blumea 31: 295 (1986).
Heteropholis annua Lazarides, Nuytsia 5: 288 (1985). Type: Guaging Station, Camp
Creek, Mitchell Plateau, Western Australia, K. Kenneally 8219 (holo: CANBI: iso:
BRI'!,DNA,K!(photo BRI),L,PERTH,US), fide Lazarides.
iv) Mnesithea formosa (R. Br.) Koning & Sosef, Blumea 31: 288 (1986).
Rottboellia formosa R. Br., Prodr. 206 (1810). Type: Island o [Mallison Island], R.
Brown {Iter Australiense 6157] (holo: BM!(photo BRI,K); iso: K!(photo
BRI),MEL!(photo BRI),NSW!(photo BRI)).
Rottboellia formosa var. pilosissima Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 85: 261 (1915). Type:
Cloncurry, Queensland, February 1910, K. Domin s.n. (holo: K!(photo BRI,
fragment NSW))).
Rottboellia formosa forma glabra Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 85: 261 (1915). Type: Castle
Hill, Townsville, Queensland, February 1910, K. Domin s.n. (?holo: K!(photo
BRI, fragment NSW!).
4. Polytrias diversiflora (Steudel) Nash, Torreya 5: 110 (1905).
Andropogon diversiflorus Steudel, Syn. pl. glumac. 1: 370 (Jul 1854). Type: Java,
Zollinger 539 (holo: n.v.; iso: P'{ photo BRI).
Andropogon amaurus Buse in Miq., Pl. jungh. 360 (Aug, 1854); Polytrias amaura
(Buse) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. 788 (1891). Type: Java, Miquel (holo: n.y.).
Lazarides (1980) takes up the name Polytrias amaura for this species, placing P.
diversiflora in synonymy, but the date of publication of Andropogon diversiflorus predates
that of A. amaurus by one month so the former’s specific epithet must be taken up
when the transfer to the genus Po/ytrias is made.
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to the Australian Biological Resources Study scheme of the
Department of the Arts, Sport, The Environment, Tourism and Territories, for a grant
for 1986-1988 to undertake research on and to prepare an account of the Andropogoneae
for the Flora of Australia. With this financial support I was able to employ the diligent
technical assistance of Simone Stewart and Danny Healy, to both of whom I extend my
thanks. It also provided some funding to enable me to visit Kew in August 1986 during
which time many types of Australian Andropogoneae in Europe were examined. | also
thank Hans Dillewaard for the photographic work and for assistance in transferring text
between computers and Gordon Guymer for consultation of type material during his
term as Australian Botanical Liaison Officer at Kew (1986-1987). Thanks are extended
to herbarium curators who loaned specimens of Andropogoneae from their institutions.
Where specimens have been collected personally, support for field work has been given
by the Queensland Herbarium and, for recent collections in the Kimberley region of
Western Australia on the Kimberley 88 project mounted by the Linnean Society of
London and the Royal Geographical Society, by the sponsors of that project.
Simon, Australian Andropogoneae 99
References
BLAKE, S.T. (1944). Monographic studies in the Australian Andropogoneae, Part 1. Papers, Department of
Biology, University of Queensland 2(3). \-62.
BLAKE, S.T. (1969). Taxonomic and nomenclatural studies in the Gramineae No. 1. Proceedings of the Royal
Society of Queensland 80: 55-88.
BLAKE, S.T. (1974). Revision of the genera Cymbopogon and Schizachyrium (Gramineae) in Australia. Contri-
butions from the Queensland Herbarium, No. 17
CLAYTON, W.D. (1969). A revision of the genus Hyparrhenia. Kew Bulletin Additional Series I.
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. (1982). Gramineae 3. In Polhill, R.M., Flora of Tropical East Africa.
Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. (1986). Genera graminum. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
DALLWITZ, M.J. & PAINE, T.A. (1986). User’s guide to the DELTA system. A general system for processing
taxonomic descriptions, 3rd ed. CSIRO, Division of Entomology Report No. 13.
DE WET, J.M.J. (1987). Hybidization and Polyploidy in the Poaceae, pp 188-194. In Soderstrom, T.R., Halu,
K.W., Campbell, C.S., & Barkworth, M.E. (eds), Grass Systematics and Evolution. Washington D.C. &
London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
DE Bean J.M.J. & HARLAN, J.R. (1962). Species relationships in Dichanthium. IIL. D. sericeum and its allies.
Phyton 18: 11-14.
DE WET, J.M.J. & HARLAN, J.R. (1966). Morphology of the compilo-species Bothriochloa intermedia. American
Journal of Botany 53: 94-98.
DE WET, J.M.J. & HARLAN, J.R. (1968). Taxonomy of Dichanthium section Dichanthium (Gramineae). Boletin
de la Sociedad Argentina de Botanica \2: 206-227.
DE WET. I.M.J. & RICHARDSON, W.L. (1963). Morphological variation and species relationships in Dichan-
thiten. Phyton 20: 19-28.
DE WET, J.M.J. & SINGH, A.P. (1964). Species relationships in Dichanthium. V. The diploid species. Caryologia
17: 153-160.
FARUQI, S.A. (1969). Range of morphological variation within the Bothriochloa intermedia complex. Phyton
(Austria) 13: 285-303.
HUBBARD, C.E. (1936). Thaumastochloa C.E. Hubbard. In Hooker, W.J., cones Plantarum 34: t. 3313, 3314.
KONING, R. DE, SOSEF, M.S.M. & VELDKAMP, J.F. (1983). A revision of Heteropholis and Thaumastochloa
(Gramineae). Gardens’ Bulletin of Singapore 36: 137-162.
LAZARIDES, M. (1980). The tropical grasses of southeast Asia. Vaduz: J. Cramer.
REEDER, J.R. (1948). The Gramineae ~ Panicoideae of New Guinea. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29: 257-
392.
SIMON, B.K. (1982). New species of Gramineae from south-eastern Queensland. Austrobaileva 1: 455-467.
SOENARKO, S. (1977). The genus Cymbopogon Sprengel (Gramineae). Reinwardtia 9: 225-375.
TOTHILL, J.C. (1977). Flowering phenology of some native perennial tropical grasses from north-eastern Australia.
Australian Journal of Ecology 2: 199-205.
TOTHILL, J.C. (1981). Distribution, Adaptation and Evolution in Australian Andropogoneae (Poaceae). XIII
International Botanical Congress, Abstracts, 279. Sydney: Australian Academy of Science.
VELDKAMP., J.F.. KONING, R. DE & SOSEF, M.S.M. (1986). Generic delimitation of Rottboellia and related
genera (Gramineae). Blumtea 31: 281-307.
Accepted for publication 10 November 1988
Austrobaileya 3(1): 101-102 (1989) | 101
REVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN VITACEAE,
4. CLEMATICISSUS PLANCHON
B.R. Jackes
Botany Department, James Cook University of North Queensland,
Townsville, Qid 4811
Summary
Clematicissus angustissima (F. Muell.) Planchon, endemic in the Geraldton area of Western Australia and the
only species in the genus, is redescribed and figured.
CLEMATICISSUS
Clematicissus Planchon in A. & C. DC, Monogr. phan. 5: 422 (1887). Type: C.
aneustissima (F. Muell.) Planchon
This monotypic genus is endemic in the Irwin District of Western Australia.
Clematicissus angustissima (F. Muell.) Planchon in A. & C. DC., Monogr. phan. 5: 422
(1887); Vitis angustissima F. Muell., Fragm. 1: 141 (1859). Type: Murchison
River, Oldfield (holo: MEL(MEL5348); iso: MEL(MEL5349),K).
F. Muell., Fragm. 1: 244 (1859), 9: 126 (1875); Benth., Fl. austral. lL: 450 (1863).
Deciduous vine or sprawling shrub to 2 m high, branches thin, striate, glabrous. Plants
deciduous, numerous tubers present. Mucilage cells and raphide sacs common throughout.
Tendrils leaf-opposed, usually bifid; branch or aborted branch subtended by a bract.
Leaves palmately compound (3-)5(-7)-foliolate, glabrous. Central leaflet from linear-
lanceolate to broadly lanceolate, (2.1-)4.5(-6.3) cm X (0.15-)0.4(-1.2) cm; apex acute;
base attenuated. Lateral leaflets similar but proportionally smaller. Margins entire to
deeply indented. Petiole slender, (0.8—)1.5(-2.8) cm long; petiolules often absent. Stipules
rounded, membraneous, 1.5-2 mm X 1i-1.5 mm. Inflorescence leaf-opposed, cymose,
multiflowered in congested heads which terminate one or both branches of the tendril;
peduncles and pedicels subtended by prominent membraneous bracts. Flowers bisexual,
pentamerous. Calyx shortly 5-lobed, 0.5-1 mm long, membraneous. Corolla with 5 free
lobes weakly cohering in bud; lobes reflexed after anthesis, soon caducous, greenish white
to mustard yellow, 1.5-2 mm long. Stamens inserted on the receptacle at the base of
the disc, opposite the petals; filaments erect, flattened, tapering towards the apex, 0.75~
1 mm long; anthers ovate, introrse, opening by longitudinal slits, ca 0.75 mm long.
Pollen grains tricolporate. Disc adnate to and entirely surrounding the base of the ovary,
broad; edge often spreading, pressure grooves formed by the filaments. Ovary 2-locular
with 2 anatropous, basally attached ovules per locule; style conical, stigma capitate.
Berry fleshy, globular to depressed-globular, purplish black to black at maturity, 7-10
mm X 4-8 mm, with | or 2(-4) pyriform seeds. Shape of seeds in transverse section
varies according to the number maturing in the fruit. Seeds 5.5-7 mm X 3.5-4 mm;
perichalaza extends to the dorsal surface where it forms a rounded depression. Endotesta
irregularly lignified, endosperm ruminate, in transverse section U-shaped. Cotyledons
similar, broadly lanceolate, persisting for up to twelve months whilst tubers are forming.
Figs 1-5.
Representative specimens: Western Australia. IRWIN District: Red Bluff ca 5 km S of Kalbarri, May 1968,
Wilson 6517 (AD,K,PERTH); Northampton, Sep 1926, Gardner 1964 (PERTH); Greenough River, Yuna East
Reserve, 70 km NE of Geraldton, Jan 1982, Jackes (CBG,L,NSW,PERTH); 37 km N of Geraldton, 28°34’S,
l'4°37E, Hnatiuk 760377(PERTH): 1.1 miles [1.8 km] N of Mingenew, Mar 1968, Carr 352 (K,PERTH).
Specimens from 35 localities examined.
Distribution and habitat: This species is found in the Geraldton area of Western Australia
extending north to the Murchison River and south to the Irwin River. Here it is found
in woodlands on a variety of soil types but chiefly on sand or loam.
102 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Fig. 1. Clematocissus angustissima: A. young leaf and inflorescence X 0.5. B. leaf X 0.5. C. seed, ventral surface
showing position of raphe x 5. D. seed, dorsal surface showing position and shape of perichalaza X 5. E. median
T.S. of mature seed X 6 ( e —lignified endotesta).
Phenology: Flowering mainly late summer and autumn; fruits mature autumn to late
spring.
Notes and observations: Superficially this summer deciduous species resembles the
partially or totally winter deciduous eastern species Cissus opaca F. Muell. The obvious
distinguishing features are the dense congested inflorescence, the different shape of the
endotesta and the pattern of formation of the tubers. A good description and illustration
of the tubers are given by Pate and Dixon (1982). Leaf shape and size are highly variable.
Reference
PATE, J.S. & DIXON, K.W. (1982). Tuberous, Cormous and Bulbous Plants. Nedlands: University of Western
Australia Press.
Accepted for publication 10 April 1989
Austrobatleya 3(1): 103-107 (1989) | 103
BRYOPHYTES IN A SUB-TROPICAL MANGROVE
COMMUNITY
J. Windolf
53 Pandanus Avenue, Coolum Beach, Queensland 4573
Summary
A descriptive and quantitative analysis of the bryophyte species in sub-tropical mangroves in southern Queensiand,
their host/substrata relationship and their occurrence relative to the adjacent non-mangrove environment is presented
here. The study is based on 337 collections.
Introduction
Bryophyte ecology has become an important discipline not only to the specialist
working within his particular field but also within general ecology. The majority of work
has been carried out in temperate or polar regions where a considerable amount of
progress has been made, resulting in at least a reasonable understanding of the position
of bryophyte life in relation to the overall environment. Unfortunately this cannot be
said of the tropics and sub-tropics, particularly as regards marginal or highly specific
habitats such as those of the savannah, lowland rainforests or mangroves (Richards
1984).
Geography, climate and physical aspects
The areas studied comprise the tidal or mangrove-supporting sections of the
Noosa, Maroochy and Mooloola River systems on the southern Queensland coast between
approximately 26°20’/S and 26°45’S, 80-120 km north of Brisbane. They contain typical
sub-tropical mangrove communities (Lear & Turner 1977) extending up to 20 km inland.
Those of the Noosa and Mooloola Rivers are principally composed of a narrow fringing
zone and saline marshes, while the Maroochy River, with its richer nutrients and hence
substrate, supports a more varied mangrove flora including extensive areas of closed
Bruguiera forest. Upstream, the landward margin of the mangroves merges with freshwater
swamps, rainforest or sugar cane plantations while near the river mouths considerable
urban development has taken place in recent years. In spite of this, remarkably little of
the original mangrove environment has been disturbed up to the present time. The
climate of the region is of the sub-tropical, humid, east-coast type, characterized by hot
summers, mild winters and a clearly defined wet-season but with sufficient rainfall in
all seasons to allow continuous growth of vegetation (Windolf 1985b).
Collecting and recording
Collecting was carried out along transects aligned at right angles to the species/
structural zonation. Sufficient transects were employed so as to include all obvious
combinations of zoning in various sections of the three separate river systems. Individual
host trees (or sub-strata) were numbered and all species found thereon were recorded
using this number. In addition such details as density of the surrounding vegetation,
height above high-tide level, proximity to non-mangrove vegetation and pertinant
information on micro-habitat were also recorded.
Host trees and sub-strata
Because of the inherent saline influence in the mangrove environment, soil, except
in the case of upturned tree bases, is virtually eliminated as a sub-stratum and 99% of
specimens were found growing either as epiphytes on living trees or on decaying timber
above the highest tide level. |
Sub-tropical mangrove environments support far fewer tree species than do those
of the true tropics. In the area under consideration six mangrove species have been
[04 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
recorded compared with the eastern Australian coast at 12°S with 28 species and 30°S
with 2 species. In addition several other species occur with varying degrees of frequency,
not only in the mangroves, but also in adjacent non-saline environments. Of these only
one, Casuarina glauca, was found to support epiphytic bryophytes within the mangrove
environment proper.
The phorophytes/sub-strata which supported bryophytes and the number of each
from which specimens were collected are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
l. Mangroves
Avicenniaceae
Ayvicennia marina (Forsskal) Vierh. 15
var. australasica (Walp.) Mold.
Rhizophoraceae
Bruguiera gymnorhiza (L.) Savigny 48
Rhizophora stylosa Griffith |
Euphorbiaceae
Excoecaria agallocha L. 36
Zs, Other
Casuarinaceae
Casuarina glauca Sieber ex Sprengel 51
Decaying timber (species not defined) {1
Soil 4
Total 166
No bryophytes were found on two mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum (L.)
Blanco and Cerlops tagal (Perrottet) C.B. Robinson var. australis C. White. In the
transitional landward zone there is a rapid changeover between mangrove species and
those more commonly associated with the adjoining non-mangrove forest. Specimens
were collected only from those areas where mangroves formed the major plant type.
Notes on bryophyte species
Hepaticae
(SEOCALYCACEAE
Lophocolea semiteres (Lehm. & Lindenb.) Mitt. Cosmopolitan. Very common locally in
a wide variety of habitats. Those occurring on mangrove plants were invariably small
and weak and in many cases appeared to be struggling to survive.
FRULLANIACEAE
Frullania ericoides (Nees) Mont. Pan-tropical. Locally common in wet sclerophyll forest,
woodland and vine scrub. The specimens observed in the mangrove forest were robust
and prolifically fertile.
Frultania ferdinandi-muelleri Steph. Endemic to the central-east Australian coastal region
(26°S-30°S). Locally common, usually on the fringes of rainforest or in lush wet sclerophyll
forest. This species had a definite preference for Bruguiera gymnorhiza and Casuarina
glauca in closed forest or well shaded sites. Specimens of F. ferdinandi-muelleri were
generally large, robust and often fertile.
Frullania rostrata (J.D. Hook. & Tayl.) J.D. Hook. & Tayl. East Australian coast, New
Zealand and the south-west Pacific region. Locally common in light scrub and woodland.
It had very limited occurrence in the mangroves, being confined to stunted Bruguiera
gymnorrhiza in low open woodland in one particular spot.
Windolf, Bryophytes in Mangroves 105
Table 2. Bryophyte species/host relationships
Mangroves Other
Avicennia Brugtiera Rhizophora Excoecaria Casuarina Decaying Soil Total
marina gyninorrhiza — stylosa agallocha glauca timber specimens
Hepaticae
Lophocoieca senuteres 9 4 l 14
Frullania ericoides 3 1S 16 7 4]
F. ferdinandi-muelleri {3 2 9 24
F. rostrata 6 6
F. subtropica 12 9 [3 15 i 50
Acrolejeunea aulacophora 6 13 i 12 16 3 51
Cheifolejeunea intertexta l 12 l 16 i 3]
Cololejeunea lanciloba 6 18 3 27
Lejeunea cucullata | I
L. flava
ssp. ortentalis 4 l 2 1 8
Leptolejeunea maculata 8 12 4 3 i 28
Schiffneriolejeunea tumida
var. haskarliana | |
Metzgeria decepiens i I
Total Hepatic specimens 27 89 2 81 65 18 1 283
Total Hepatic species 4 12 2 8 7 8 I 13
Musci
Fissidens humutis I 4 3 8
Macromitrium aurescens 3 7 16 5 3
Sematophyliunt sp. j 8 6 45
Total Musci specimens 3 2 7 28 11 3 54
Total Musci species l 2 | 3 2 l 3
Total specimens 30 91 2 8&8 93 29 4 337
Total species 5 i4 2 9 10 id 2 16
Frullania subtropica Steph. Endemic to the central-east Australian coast (20°S-—30°S).
Locally common, often in quite dry habitats. This species preferred open sites in the
mangroves and often covered large areas of the trunks of Casuarina glauca and the near
horizontal limbs of Avicennia marina. The plants were robust and often fertile. In terms
of volume, F. subtropica is probably the dominant bryophyte in the mangroves.
LEJEUNEACEAE
Acrolejeunea aulacophora (Mont.) Steph. Widespread throughout the Pacific and Indian
Ocean regions. Very common locally in a wide variety of habitats and it was well
diversified throughout most parts of the mangrove environment.
Cheilolejeunea intertexta (Lindenb.) Steph. Pan-tropical and sub-tropical. Uncommon in
the surrounding areas. Had a distinct preference for Excoecaria agallocha and Bruguiera
gymnorrhiza, particularly in stunted mangrove scrub.
Cololejeunea lanciloba Steph. Tropical south-west Pacific, south-east Asian regions and
Japan. Relatively common in nearby rainforest and scrub. This species was generally
well developed, prolifically fertile and obviously relishes this particular habitat. kxcoecaria
agallocha in dense closed forest was the preferred host/habitat.
106 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Lejeunea cucullata (Reinw., Blume & Nees) Nees. Widespread in tropical areas of the
Indo-Pacific region. As only a single specimen was collected, it suggests that the mangroves
are not a preferred habitat, but the species 1s also rare in the surrounding vegetation.
Lejeunea fiava (Sw.) Nees subsp. orientalis Schust. Widespread, the species being cos-
mopolitan. Extremely common locally in rainforest, wet sclerophyll forest and damp
woodland. In the mangroves it was confined to the lush closed forest and the plants
collected were not particularly well developed.
Leptolejeunea maculata (Mitt.) Schiffn. Widespread in tropical regions. The species is
reasonably common locally and the specimens from the mangroves were robust and well
established in a variety of micro-habitats.
Schiffneriolejeunea tumida (Nees) Grad. var. haskarliana (Gott.) Grad. & Terken. South-
west Pacific and south-east Asian regions. Uncommon locally and as only a single
specimen was collected from the mangroves, it indicates its rarity in that habitat as well.
METZGERIACEAE
Metzgeria decipiens (Massal.) Schifin. & Gott. Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific
region. Locally common, but mostly in upland rainforest and wet sclerophyll forest. The
single specimen found in the mangroves was small and poorly developed.
Muscli
FISSIDENTACEAE
Fissidens humilis Dix. & Watts. Eastern Australia and New Zealand. Reasonably common
locally on damp banks and tree bases, particularly Melaleuca quinquinervia in freshwater
swamps. In the mangroves it favoured relatively open positions with broken sunlight,
only a few centimetres above the high tide level, occurring on bark and on soil retained
between the roots of upturned trees.
ORTHOTRICHACEAE
Macromitrium aurescens Hampe. Endemic to north-east Australia. Local distribution is
unknown apart from the mangroves but it is probably not common. Its preferred habitat
in the mangroves was on Excoecaria agallocha in open woodland and in open forest on
Casuarina glauca, often in very exposed situations above the main canopy. This tallies
with Vitt and Ramsay’s (1985) comment that this species of Macromitrium appears to
be somewhat xerophytic having an affinity with rough barked host species.
SEMA TOPHYLLACEAE
Sematophyllum sp. Sematophyllum 1s a widespread, very complex genus usually associated
with damp habitats although some species are found 1n seasonally drier areas. The genus
is very common in surrounding districts where a number of species occur. Specimens
have not yet been identified to species level.
Conclusions
Analysis of the data revealed some significant ecological peculiarities as regards
the bryophyte flora on the mangroves of this area. These can be summarised as follows:
A. Hepatics outnumbered the Musci both in terms of species (Hepatics 84%, Musci 16%)
and individual plants.
B. Hepatic specimens were dominated by the genera Frullania (43%), Acrolejeunea (18%),
Cheilolejeunea (11%), Leptolejeunea (10%) and Cololejeunea (10%), others being
of only spasmodic occurrence. Macromitrium (57%) and Sematophyllum (28%)
account for the majority of mosses.
C. Virtually all specimens were epiphytic (99%) because of the peculiar nature of the
mangrove environment.
D. Species prevalence varied somewhat from that of adjacent non-mangrove environments.
E. Some marked bryophyte/phorophyte relationships existed.
Windolf, Bryophytes in Mangroves 107
Although the area studied is essentially sub-tropical in form, it exhibits many
positive similarities to those observed by Thaitong in the tropical mangrove forests of
Thailand (Thaitong 1984). This is particularly so with regard to Hepatic genera. Of the
12 recorded by Thaitong and the 9 described here, 7 are common to both areas, Whether
or not these factors are constant in mangrove environments will only be revealed by
comparing detailed studies carried out in different areas.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement is due to Sinski Hattori, Barbara Thiers, Helen Ramsay and
George Scott for their help in identifying specimens and providing general information;
George Scott for reading the text and to Phillip Sharpe for his encouragement and
assistance on numerous collecting trips.
References
LEAR, R. & TURNER, T. (1977). Mangroves of Australia. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
RICHARDS, P.W. (1984). The Ecology of Tropical Forest Bryophytes. In Schuster, R.M. (ed.), New Manual of
Bryology. Vol. 2. 1233-1270. Nichinan, Miyazaki: Hattori Botanical Laboratory.
THAITONG, U. (1984). Bryophytes of the Mangrove Forest. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 56:
85-87.
VITT, D.H. & RAMSAY, H.P. (1985). The Afacromitrium Complex in Australasia (Orthotrichaceae: Bryopsida).
Part 1. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 59: 325-451.
WINDOLF, J. (1985b). Survey of the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of the Sunshine Coast Region, Queensland.
Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 58: 171-176.
Accepted for publication 11 August 1988
Austrobaileya 3(1): 109-133 (1989) 109
NOTES ON ASCLEPIADACEAE, 1
P.1. Forster
Botany Department, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4067
Summary
Cynanchum liebiana (F. Muell.) P. Forster comb. noy. and C. christineae P. Forster sp. noy. are described.
Sarcostemma esculentum (L.f.) Holm is newly recorded for Australia with Marsdenta brockmaniana W. Fitzg.
placed in synonymy. The status of 7ylophora erecta F. Muell. ex Benth., 7. macrophylla Benth. and Tf. stelligera
Schitr. is reviewed with 7. macrophylla and T. stelligera being relegated to synonymy. Tylophora benthamii Tsiang
is shown to be the earliest available name for the taxon known variously as 7. floribunda Benth. or T. crebriflora
S.T. Blake. Isotype material of Sarcolobus ciliolatus Warb. and S. obovatus Rintz at the Queensland Herbarium
is documented and S. obovatus recorded for the Solomon Islands and northern Papua New Guinea. A generic
account for Finlaysonia Wallich in Australia and New Guinea is given, with F. obovata Wallich being recorded
for the region. Gyrmnema sylvestre (Retz.) R. Br. ex Schultes is lectotypified. The species does not occur in Australia.
Gymnema pleiadenium F. Muell. is an earlier name for the taxen known as Gymnema dunnii (Maiden & Betche)
P. Forster. G. pleiadenium is distinguished from G. geminatum R. Br. and G. sylvestre. Brachystelma glabriflorum
(F, Muell.) Schltr. is the earliest name for the species of Brachystelma that occurs in Australia and New Guinea.
Contents
CVHAMCHVNIES wos x als Goce in OM ee Ege be tn Se te cee AE pS te a sah 110
Sarcéstenntia BK Br. .. os
TEA te a a
o
Pons hratyhes aA Le AMEN STR
bith
HEME te ee en EN BEE ET
He mE A TEE AA MEMES EY
RRP er rere re rccorrcecereer rrr r rs
[20 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
tll
ae
a
so
rd ethane
ha
A
f
t
(mh tle
ie?
ig
4
4
#
*
"
5. Tylophora erecta: A. compound cyme X |. B. apical view of part of calyx x 7. C. lateral view of flower
3. (Note: entire surface pubescent except for a few broad interior corolla margins.) D. apical view of flower
5. E. apical view of staminal column and staminal corona X 21. F. lateral view of staminal corona and
staminai column X 21. G. pollinarium X 37. All from spirit material of Forster 4252 & Liddle. Del. K. Harold.
Forster, Asclepiadaceae, | [21
sparsely to densely pubescent below; petiole 10-33 mm long, c. | mm diameter; 2-9
extrafloral nectaries at lamina base. Flowers borne on upper 2-5 nodes. Cymes appearing
at the nodes between the pairs of leaves; |-many-flowered, up to 8 cm wide; bracts on
cyme, linear-lanceolate, c. 4 mm long, 0.5 mm wide; peduncle to 15 mm long, c. 1 mm
diameter, pale green; pubescent. Pedicels 7-15 mm long, 0.5—1 mm diameter, pubescent,
light green. Flowers rotate, purple, brown or red, 3-7 mm long, 7-11 mm diameter:
tube up to 2 mm deep. Sepals 5, distinct, linear-lanceolate, 2.5-4 mm long, 1-1.5 mm
wide, sparsely pubescent externally; generally with 1-2 glands at the base on the adaxial
side. Petals 5, distinct, lanceolate, 3-5 mm long, 2~3 mm wide, finely pubescent externally
and internally. Corona of 5 separate lobes adnate to stamina! column below anthers, 1-
2 mm long, 1.5-4 mm diameter; lobes flattened, tongue shaped, 1.5-1.75 mm long,
0.75-1 mm wide; same colour as corolla. Staminal column 1-2 mm long, c. 1.5 mm
diameter. Anther appendages ovate-obtuse, c. 0.25-0.5 mm long, c. 0.25-0.5 mm wide.
Slit between anther wings 0.25-0.4 mm long. Style-head flattened pentagonal, with a
bifid style, c. 1.5 mm wide, pale green, 0.5-1.0 mm longer than staminal column.
Pollinaria 0.15-0.16 mm long, 0.3-0.4 mm wide; pollinia globose, held horizontally to
erect, 0.13-0.15 mm long, 0.12-0.15 mm wide, golden; corpusculum oblong, tan, c. 0.10
mm long, 0.05 mm wide; caudicles unwinged, 0.05-0.07 mm long, 0.01 mm wide.
Ovaries free, few sparse hairs, c. 2 mm long, 1.5 mm wide. Follicles fusiform, 9-12 cm
long, 1-2 cm wide; seed oblong, tan, 8-9 mm long, 4 mm wide; coma 20-25 mm long,
attached to germinating end of seed. Fig. 6.
Selected specimens: Northern Territory. DARWIN AND GULF District: Murganella Area, 11°26’S, 132°58’E, Feb
1984, Jones 1387 (BRI,DNA*); 6 km 8S of Brogden Pt, Murganella, 11°34’S, 133°04’E, Mar 1987, Russell-Smiith
1985 & Lucas (BRI,DNA*); Little Nourlangie Rock, 12°52’S, 132°48’E, May 1978, Dunlop 4826 (DNA); Lightning
Dreaming, Arnhemiand, 12°55’S, 133°02’E, Feb 1984, Dunlop 6592 & Wightman (DNA); East Alligator River,
10 km 8 of Cannon Hill Ranger Stn, 12°27'S, 132°58’E, May 1980, Craven 6010 (CANB,DNA); Katherine Gorge
N.P., 14°19’S, 132°28’E, Jun 1983, King 237 (DNA); Liverpool River mouth, Tudor Pt, 11°59’S, 134°15’E, Jun
1987, Russell-Smith 2564 & Lucas (DNA); Cobourg Peninsula, 11°09’S, 132°09’E, Jul 1982, Wightman 137 &
Dunlop (DNA); Goomadeer: Gundjumbul outlier, 12°04’S, 133°44’E, Oct 1987, Russell-Smuth 3834 & Lucas
(DNA). Queensland. Cook District: Tolga, Nov 1985, Williams 85310 (BRI); Bamaga, c. 27 km SW of Cape
York, Oct 1965, Smith 12664 (BRD; cult. ex S.F.R. 144, 16°17/S, 145°0S’E, Nov 1978, Gray 1120 (QRS*);
Wongabel, 17°20’S, 145°28’E, Sep 1957, Smith 10171 (BRI). NortTH KENNEDY District: Wilkin Hill, Hinchinbrook
Is, L8°16’S, 146°14VE, May 1972, Webb & Tracey 12006 (BRI,CANB); Tully, Dec 1949, Clemens [AQ217019]
(BRI). WIDE Bay District: Mt Allan, Booloumba Ck S.F.R. near Kenilworth, Mar 1987, Sharpe 4659 (BRI*);
Cold Ck, S.F. 301, 25°53’S, 152°24’E, Nov 1988, Forster 4839 (BRI*). MoRETON District: W Slopes of Mt
Roberts, McPherson Range, Mar 1945, Blake 15483 (BRI); c. | km S of Coolum Beach P.O., Apr 1978, Sharpe
2486 (BRI). New South Wales. Fingal Head, May 1967, Blake 22789 (BRI).
Distribution and habitat: Near the coast from Sawtell in New South Wales to the top
of Cape York Peninsula in Queensland and into the north of the Northern Territory
which equates to the MCPH, CYRK, BURD, ARNM and DWSN Regions of Barlow
(1985) (Map 2). It occurs in a wide variety of rainforest types from littoral rainforest at
low altitudes to higher altitude rainforests on the Atherton Tableland (e.g. Tolga and
Wongabel).
Phenology: Flowering and fruiting throughout the year.
Conservation status: While the species is widespread in northern Australia, it is markedly
disjunct and very rarely encountered in southeastern Queensland and northeastern New
South Wales. It is not endangered, threatened or vulnerable at this stage.
SARCOLOBUS R. Br.
In his revision of Sarcolobus R. Br., Rintz (1980) lists the type citation for S.
ciliolatus as being “Moluccas, Aroe & Kei Is., Warburg 21317” with an isotype being
present at A. Material labelled S. ciliolatus Warb. (a synonym of S. retusus K. Schum.)
exists at BRI with the label formation “Plants of Key Arch. 1889 Warburg 21317”.
There have been numerous examples of specimens with different label information
forming part of the same collection in material collected during the 19th century,
especially with duplicated collections at different herbaria (Merrill 1915). If the collections
have identical collection numbers (as opposed to the species numbers used by some
collectors, which generally do not run into 5 digits) and are of the same species, and
there 1s no information available on the location of duplicates, it is reasonable to assume
that they represent the same collection. The BRI material of Warburg 21317 is referable
to S. refusus and 1s therefore considered to represent an isotype of S. ciliolatus.
Fig. 6.
pollinarium (lacking { pollintum) X 37. All from Gray 1534. Del. K. Harold.
Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
:
= =)".
= =
a +=
=
= £2
a = e255
«
wo. = = £e ee
* = = = a7
~E+ ts = -.
= = =
Fer — =*, = st
=< = 227 ae
=
aTLOF = = ea Ard
7. * <= = = a* 2a
J 3 aay = Be
es =F 4 = * ee
1 » tre = ¥ a=
es = = = z=
re «¢ s *« * = #4*#,*
a =_s
s+ =. tax? =
= = « z =
i =, * 2 . zat aE -? w
+2 Fa *~ Ses agurt = = =
= i. * = * Sete
s*f a3 7 * =
e#Fa
fis sae hte
< ‘eg? 1 = =2fZ
# # = Zt 3% 2*
* + ? * =
= = = evtte a
= =F ‘* «7
= = = F ded = ‘24
he - = ze: = 5s
= 4 se ‘.
= ad s =3 ,t=*.
= e ore
+ = > +*
= 4 = =
* « = eee
* > # «
2* < «+
f#4tt*t iy = =
Feta =z 5”
v2 % = = bal
Set = = ~ *
= = = =
the = =e -~ <= «
72 se™ * =< ,tt ©
= a™ + -* stat
ees 25 lt ty tte a ot
= = «a= = =mFt |g
= = Ss
aaa Ft == =
ea, *5 = | ad ==s*i
ae ot 4a" a
steve -2 5
a ae
lg’ cant =
s = +25 Js!
=
"7 be "s4.7"5 = *5
=e = = =e
psstias
PN ee
ip 35
ve
ba
Fig. 2. Trachymene clivicola: A. habit X 0.5. B. fruit 6. Trachymene cussonii: C. fruit X 6. D. branch with
mature umbel X 0.5.
Holland, Trachymene, | 139
Reference
BOYLAND, D.E. & STANLEY, T.D. (1981} Umbelliferae. In J. Jessop (ed.), Flora of Central Australia 266-271.
Sydney: A.H. & A.W. Reed Pty. Ltd.
Accepted for publication 26 April 1989
Austrobaileya 3(1): 141-148 (1989) 14]
NEW SPECIES OF BULBOPHYLLUM
SECTION OXYSEPALUM (ORCHIDACEAE) IN AUSTRALIA
B. Gray
CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, PO Box 780, Atherton, Qid 4883
and D.L. Jones
Australian National Botanic Gardens
GPO Box 1777, Canberra, ACT 2601
Summary
Bulbophyllum grandimesense, B. lewisense and B. windsorense, all members of section Oxysepalum from north-
eastern Queensland, are described as new and their relationships with previously known species of the section are
discussed. A key to Australian species in section Oxysepalum is included.
Introduction
As outlined by Dockrill (1969), the section Oxysepalum Schltr. in the genus
Bulbophyllum Thouars in Australia contains two species, viz B. gadgarrense Rupp and
B. wadsworthii Dockr. Field studies by the senior author have revealed three further
species which are here described as new. Two species are closely related to B. wadsworthil,
the other to B. gadgarrense.
‘Taxonomy
Bulbophyllum grandimesense B. Gray & D. Jones species nova affinis B. wadsworthii
Dockr. sed foliis angustioribus et petiolatis, floribus majoribus concoloribus
eburneis ad albis differt. Typus: Queensland. Cook District: T.R. 146, Parish
of Monkhouse, Tableland L.A., 15°43’S, 145°17’E, 800 m, 3 May 1983, B. Gray
3045 (holo: QRS; iso: BRI).
Plant epiphytic, consisting of a few semi-erect to pendulous rarely branched stems to
about 8 cm long; roots wiry, ca 0.5 mm diameter, mainly from basal nodes, some stem-
embracing adventitious roots arising from upper nodes; rhizomes ca | mm diameter,
covered by pale brown to dark brown scarious bracts, 8-25 mm_ between pseudobulbs;
pseudobulbs 4-6 mm X 1.5-2.5 mm, more or less ovoid to cylindrical, green, sulcate
on underside, decurrent. Leaf lamina 14-50 mm X 3-5 mm, linear to linear-oblong,
more or less round in cross-section with a narrow groove on the upper surface, on
petioles 4-5 mm long. Pedicels ca 1.5 mm long, bracteate; flowers ca 8 mm long, solitary
at nodes, white throughout, sepals spreading to about 7 mm apart at tips; sepals subsimular,
8-9 mm X 2-2.5 mm, narrowly triangular, constricted in distal third, apices long-
acuminate to filiform: petals ca 2.5 mm X ca 1.5 mm, more or less ovate, narrowing at
base, slightly incurved; labellum ca 2.3 mm X ca 1.3 mm, fleshy, distinctly 3-lobed,
erect in proximal half, then curving in a semi-circle, surface smooth, lateral lobes ca lL.
mm long, erect, mid-lobe obtuse; column ca 1.2 mm long; stelidia ca 0.6 mm long, very
short, broadly triangular, blunt to rounded; column foot ca 2.2 mm long, curved; anther
cap ca 0.5 mm X ca 0.5 mm, with a prominently deflexed rostrum ca 0.13 mm long.
Capsule not seen. Fig. 1.
Specimens examined (ail QRS): Queensland. Cook District: T.R. 146, Parish of Monkhouse, Tableland L.A.
15°43’S. 145°17’E, 800 m, May 1983, Gray 3045; T.R. 146, Parish of Monkhouse, Big Tableland, 15°42’S, 145°16’E,
500 m, Aug 1984, Gray 3524.
Distribution and habitat: At present this species is known only from the Big Tableland
on the Trevethan Range north of the Bloomfield River. It grows in highland rainforest
between 500-800 m altitude. Plants favour the small, upper branches of trees in the
rainforest canopy.
Flowering Period: May—June.
142 Austrobaileya 3(1}; 1989
Notes: Bulbophyllum grandimesense has some affinities with B. wadsworthii but it can
be readily distinguished by its much narrower, petiolate leaves and the larger, uniformly
coloured cream to white flowers. The flowers of B. wadsworthii are also cream to white
but have a brown to orange-brown labellum. B. grandimesense is the only member of
the section Oxysepalum known to grow on the Big Tableland.
Conservation Status: Bulbophyllum grandimesense is a poorly collected species and from
the collections available appears to be restricted to a fairly limited, highland habitat. Its
conservation status is 2RC according to Leigh, Briggs and Hartley (1981).
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the Latin grandis, big, and the Spanish
mesa, tableland, a reference to the distribution of this species on the Big Tableland.
amm
Fig. 1. Bulbophyllum grandimesense. A. habit. B. flower from front. C. flower from side. D. column and labellum
from side. E. column from front. F. column and labellum from front. G. pollinia from front. H. pollinia from
side. 1. anther from front. J. anther from side. All from Gray 3045.
Gray & Jones, Bulbophyllum 143
Bulbophyllum lewisense B. Gray & D. Jones species nova affinis B. gadgarrensi Rupp
sed plantis exilioribus, pseudobulbis conspicuis nudis, floribus albis differt. Typus:
Queensland. Cook District: S.F.R. 143, South Mary L.A. 16°30/S, 145° 15’E,
1000 m, 13 October 1979, B. Gray 1539 (holo: QRS; iso: BRI,NSW).
Plant epiphytic, consisting of a few semi-pendulous or spreading, rarely branched stems
to about 15 cm long; roots wiry, ca 0.5 mm diameter, mainly from basal nodes, some
adventitious stem-embracing roots arising from upper nodes; rhizomes ca | mm diameter,
covered by pale brown, scarious bracts, 5-10 mm between pseudobulbs; pseudobulbs 4-
5 mm X 3-3.5 mm, more or less ovoid, green, sulcate on underside, decurrent. Leaf
lamina 15-22 mm X 3-5 mm, narrowly oblong to narrowly elliptic, thick and fleshy,
dark green, slightly curved, deeply grooved on upper surface, more or less cordate in
cross section, shortly petiolate. Pedicels ca 3.5 mm long, bracteate, flowers ca 5 mm
long, white throughout, solitary at nodes, sepals spreading to about 4 mm apart at the
tips: sepals subsimilar, 5-6 mm X 1.5-2 mm, narrowly triangular, apices cymbiform,
acuminate: petals 2-2.5 mm X ca 0.8 mm, oblong, slightly spreading; labellum ca 2 mm
x ca 1 mm, fleshy, distinctly three-lobed, erect in proximal half then curving in a seml-
circle, surface smooth, lateral lobes ca 1 mm long, erect, mid-lobe obtuse; column ca
0.8 mm long; stelidia ca 0.4 mm long, narrowly triangular, bluntly pointed; column foot
ca 2 mm long, curved; anther cap ca 0.4 mm X 0.5 mm, with a prominent deflexed
rostrum ca 0.1 mm long. Capsule not seen. Fig. 2.
Specimens examined. (all QRS). Cook District: S.F.R. 143, Parish of Riflemead, North Mary L.A., 16°31'S,
(45°16’E, 1100 m, Aug 1986, Collins s.n., Zarda Roots Creek, Jan 1936, Flecker, Flecker Herbarium 1303; S.F.R.
144, Parish of Whypalla, Bower Bird L.A., 16°L5’S, 145°OV’E, 1240 m, Aug 1984, Gray 3535; S.F.R. 143, South
Mary L.A., 16°30’S, 145°1S’E, 100 m, Oct 1979, Gray 1539: S.F.R. 144, Cockatoo L.A., 16°17’S, 145°05’E, 960
m, Jui 1982, Gray 2671; S.F.R.143, Parish of Riflemead, 16°32'S, 145°1VE, 1100 m, Oct 1984, Gray 3574.
Distribution and habitat: B. /ewisense occurs on Mt Lewis, Carbine Tableland and
Windsor Tableland. It grows on trees in rainforest at medium to high elevations (900-
1200 metres) and seems to favour slender trunks or smal! branches in the upper canopy.
Flowering Period: September and October.
Notes: B. Jewisense has as its closest congener B. gadgarrense but it can be readily
distinguished by the smaller, more open plants, naked, conspicuous pseudobulbs and
white flowers. The two species grow together in some areas but are easily distinguished.
The new species always forms small, sparse clumps and the roots arise mainly from the
base of the stems. This contrasts with B. gadgarrense in which many of the roots arise
from aerial nodes along the stems.
Conservation Status: Sparsely distributed but not rare.
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the type locality, Mt Lewis.
Bulbophyllum windsorense B. Gray & D., Jones species nova affinis B. wadsworthii Dockr.
sed foliis brevioribus valde canaliculatis, floribus majoribus concoloribus eburneis
ad viridi-eburneis differt. Typus: Queensland. Cook District: S.F.R. 144, Parish
of Whypalla, Bower Bird L.A., 16°14’S, 143°00’E, 1220 m, 15 June 1981, B. Gray
4503 (holo: QRS; iso: BRI,NSW).
Plant epiphytic, consisting of a few to several, upright to pendulous, rarely branched
stems to 30 cm long; roots wiry, ca 0.5-0.8 mm diameter, arising from basal nodes or
base of branches: rhizomes 1-1.5 mm diameter, covered by brown scarious bracts, 8—-
20 mm between pseudobulbs; pseudobulbs 5-8 mm X 4-5 mm, obovate to almost
cylindrical, decumbent, truncate, only partly obscured by bracts. Leaves 12-30 mm X
4-6 mm, narrowly elliptic to oblong, sessile, acute, thick and fleshy, more or less round
in cross section, broadly and deeply grooved on the upper surface, often compressed
laterally closing the groove. Peduncles ca 4-6 mm long including the ovary, bracteate;
flowers solitary or in pairs from nodes and internodes, cream or greenish cream,
10-13 mm long, sepals spreading 7-16 mm apart at the apices; sepals subsimilar, 9-12
mm X 3.5-4.5 mm, narrowly triangular, constricted in the distal half, apices filiform,
lateral sepals connate for about 2 mm at the base; petals 2-3 mm xX 1.2~1.5 mm, obovate;
labellum 2.2-2.5 mm X 1.6-2 mm when flattened, fleshy, erect in proximal half then
curved in a semicircle, surface smooth, lateral lobes ca 1 mm long, erect, midlobe
recurved, 1-1.2 mm long, more or less obtuse; column I-1.2 mm long; stelidia very
144 Austrobatleya 3(1): 1989
Fig. 2. Bulbophyllum lewisense: A. habit. B. flower from side. C. flower from front. D. column and labellum from
side. E. column from front. F. anther from side. G. anther from front. H. pollinia from front. All from Gray
1539.
Gray & Jones, Bulbophyllum i45
short, oblong; column foot 1.5-1.8 mm long, curved almost in a semicircle with the
column: anther ca 0.35 mm X 0.35 mm, with a deflexed rostrum. Capsule not seen. Fig.
3.
Distribution and habitat: Known only from highland rainforests of the Mt Windsor
Tableland. Common at elevations above 1000 m and growing in small clumps on the
upper branches of trees in the rainforest canopy.
Flowering Period: May—August.
Notes: B. windsorense is probably most closely related to B. wadsworthii, but it can be
readily distinguished by the larger, uniformly coloured flowers and the shorter, deeply
srooved leaves.
Conservation status: Its conservation status is 3RC according to Leigh, Briggs & Hartley
(1981),
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the type locality, Windsor Tableland.
Discussion
The five Australian species of Bulbophyllum in section Oxysepalum are confined
to north-eastern Queensland where they grow in highland rainforests above 500 m
altitude. All species grow on trees with B. wadsworthii and B. gadgarrense sometimes
also found on boulders. Field observations indicate that the newly described species are
relatively uncommon to rare and they tend to occupy different ecological niches. Further
exploration of isolated highland regions in north-eastern Queensland could result in the
discovery of new taxa in this group. Members of this section can be identified from
non-flowering material and an illustration of cross-sections and outlines of leaves is
included (Fig. 4), as these provide valuable diagnostic characters.
Key to Australian species of Bulbophyllum
section Oxysepalum
[.. eaves PetOlate a Ge yy eee wh del eas be Ge So ate tee om ee eS Me a he ee 2
aes SESS 88. nena cll ot Tel ae hates fy ov Dl oY eg be See ne on ete at ges 4
2. Leaf lamina narrowly grooved (more or less round in cross-section);
petioles 4-6 mm long; pseudobulbs 4-7 mm long, 2-3 mm broad,
conspicuous; flowers white or creamy white; sepals long acumin-
Ate 0 cc ee ce ee ee se ee ee sete vevs.aee..... 3B. grandimesense
Leaf lamina broadly grooved or channelled in cross-section ............ 3
3. Leaf lamina very thick and fleshy, nearly oblong, 15-25 mm long, 3-4
mm broad: petioles 1-3 mm long; pseudobulbs 2-3 mm long, I-1.2
mm broad, almost concealed by stem bracts; flowers yellow or orange;
sepals narrowly triangular, obtuse .................... B. gadgarrense
Leaf lamina thin, narrowly elliptic 20-45 mm long, 3-6 mm broad;
pseudobulbs 4-5 mm long, 3-3.5 mm broad, conspicuous; flowers
white or creamy white; sepals broadly triangular, acute or shortly
BORTHINATES eri Gee atv lee wee eA gens! Ca od. aie et athe th omy cts B. lewisense
4. Leaf lamina narrowly grooved (nearly round in cross-section), 20-80 mm
long; flowers white, creamy white or pale green; labellum orange or
orange brown; sepals long acuminate eee ee Pe B. wadsworthii
Leaves broadly grooved in cross-section .. .. 2. 6. ee ee ee ee ee ee 5
5. Leaf lamina short, thick and fleshy, nearly oblong, 15-30 mm long, 4-6
mm broad; flowers pale yellow or greenish yellow; sepals long
acuminate .... 2... ee ee ee ee ee ee ee te ee ea es ee... B. windsorense
Leaf lamina thin, narrowly elliptic 20-45 mm long, 3-6 mm broad; flowers
white or creamy white; sepals acute or shortly acuminate ...... B. lewisense
146 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Fig. 3. Bulbophyllum windsorense. A. habit. B. flower from front. C. flower from side. D. column and labellum
from side. E. column from front. F. labellum from front. G. anther from side. H. anther from front. 1. pollinia
from front. All from Gray 4503.
147
Gray & Jones, Bulbophyllum
Fig. 4. Leaf, pseudobulb and bract habit of Bulbophyllum sect. Oxysepalum. 1. B, grandimesense. 2. B. windorense.
3B. wadsworthii. 4. B. lewisense. 5. B. gadgarrense.
148 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Lyn Craven, CSIRO, for the Latin translations, Reg Lockyer
and Ron Collins for supplying live plants for study, and Barbara Jones for typing the
manuscript. Jim Armstrong and Mark Clements, both of the Australian National Botanic
Gardens, read the draft manuscript. Bob Johnson, Director, Queensland Herbarium:
provided access to material at BRI.
References
DOCKRILL (1969). Australian Indigenous Orchids, Vol. [. Sydney: Society for Growing Australian Plants.
LEIGH, J., BRIGGS, J. & HARTLEY, W. (1981). Rare or Threatened Australian Plants. Australian National
Parks and Wildlife Service Special Publication No. 7. Canberra: Australian National Parks and Wildlife
Service.
Accepted for publication 17 April 1989
Austrobaileya 3(1): 149-158 (1989) 149
REVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN VITACEAE,
5. TETRASTIGMA (MIQ.) PLANCHON
B.R. Jackes
Botany Department, James Cook University of North Queensland,
Townsville, Qld 4811
Summary
Tetrastigma nitens (F. Muell.) Planchon, previously the only known species of Tetrastigma recorded for Australia,
is redescribed. Three new species T. crenatum, T. petraeum and T. thorsborneorum are described and illustrated.
A description of T. pisicarpum is included as specimens from a vine growing in vine forest at the tip of Cape York
possibly belong to this species. A description of the genus is also given, together with a key to the species.
This paper completes the revision of the Australian species of the Vitaceae. The
genera described are Ampelocissus Planchon (Jackes 1984), Cayratia Juss. (Jackes 1987),
Cissus L. (Jackes 1988a) and the Western Australian endemic C/lematicissus (F. Muell.)
rire (Jackes 1989). A key to the genera in Australia has been given by Jackes
(1988b).
TETRASTIGMA
Tetrastigma (Miq.) Planchon in A. & C. DC., Monogr. phan. 5: 423 (1887); Vitis sect.
Tetrastigma Miq., Ann. mus. lugd.-bat. 1: 72 (1863). Type: Vitis lanceolaria Roxb.
(= Tetrastigma lanceolarium (Roxb.) Planchon.)
Climbing evergreen vines, dioecious. Stems striate, initially rounded but often becoming
flattened with age; underground root system extensive. Tendrils leaf-opposed, unbranched
or branched, branches subtended by a bract. Leaves alternate, trifoliolate or pedately 5-
{1-foliolate, margins indented rarely entire; indentations usually small. Stipules 2, cad-
ucous. Inflorescence in Australian species axillary, shortly pedunculate, cymose with
terminal multiflowered umbels: peduncles and pedicels subtended by bracts. Flowers
unisexual, tetramerous. Calyx cup-shaped; margin entire or shallowly lobed. Corolla with
4 free lobes: lobes cohering in bud, cucullate at apex, usually reflexed after anthesis,
soon caducous. Stamens inserted on the receptacle at base of disc opposite petals;
filaments erect: anthers in male flowers ovate-triangular, dorsifixed, introrse, opening by
longitudinal slits; anthers in female flowers on staminodia, much reduced. Pollen grains
tricolporate. Disc obscure, adnate to and entirely surrounding the base of the ovary in
female flowers, almost completely covering the much reduced non-functional ovary in
male flowers. Fertile ovary 2-locular with 2 anatropous, basally attached ovules per
locule, conical; style short or absent; stigma large, 4-lobed, often ciliolate. Berry fleshy,
globose to elliptical, with 1-4 ovoid to globose seeds. Shape of seeds in median transverse
section varies according to the number maturing in the fruit; perichalaza extends for
two-thirds to almost the total length of the dorsal surface. Endotesta irregularly lignified,
endosperm ruminate, appearing convoluted in median transverse section. Mucilage ceils
and raphide sacs often containing mucilage appear to be present in all organs. Cotyledons
lanceolate, three-veined at base, margins entire.
This genus is readily distinguished from the other genera of the Vitaceae by the
dioecious flowers and the large 4-lobed stigma present in the pistillate flowers, and the
capitate, entire stigma in the staminate flowers. In Australia, non-fertile specimens of
Tetrastigma are usually readily recognised in the field by the firm, palmate or pedately
compound, distinctly petiolate leaves which are glabrous or apparently glabrous but
minutely puberulent when examined under magnification.
There appears to be little intraspecific variation with respect to leaf characters.
This is unusual when compared to the other genera of Vitaceae occurring in Australia.
Main characters used for distinguishing between the species are. leaflet number, size of
leaflets, and presence or absence of hairs. All measurements and observations in this
paper refer to dried mature organs except where otherwise indicated.
150 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Zetrastigma occurs chiefly in the Asian tropics and subtropics. It extends from
India north to China, south to Australia and eastward to Fiji; more than half the 120
species which have been described occur in Malesia. Eighteen have been described from
Papua New Guinea but many of these are inadequately known. Australian species fall
into three groups: 7. nitens (F. Muell.) Planchon and T. petraeum sp. nov., which form
a closely related pair with different habitat preferences, the former being found chiefly
in or adjacent to rainforest, whilst the latter occurs in drier habitats: T. crenatum Sp.
noy., which is closely related to the Papua New Guinean species 7. lauterbachianum
Gilg.; and 7. thorsborneorum sp. nov., which is closely related to T. pisicarpum (Miq.}
Planchon, which occurs in southern Papua New Guinea. Vegetative material and
specimens with immature staminate inflorescences collected in the Lockerbie scrub area
at the tip of Cape York possibly belong to this species; however its status cannot be
resolved until mature flowering and fruiting material is collected.
Terms used to describe rainforest habitats are those of Webb (1978),
Key to Species
b, dGaves SelOHOlale ss 1-8 4-6 kk oe cog Lee ee nw vaneec My eles cee ee nt Oe. 2
PEEVES POC ACiees cot: dey ia aha S86. ta covet Deas prey her lal om Ss ba eis 4
2. Leaves pubescent chiefly on lower surface of the midrib; margins crenate-
serrulate, peg-like lenticels present on older stems.......... 1. T. crenatum
Leaves glabrous, margins entire to irregularly serrate, lenticels not peg-like .. 3
3. Central leaflet more than 9 cm long, length/breadth ratio 2.08 +
Central leaflet rarely exceeding 8 cm long, length/breadth ratio 1.45 +
EI Pert chen oo cnt nce, cheb d hte s MR oh Sey ot Sail y ccc here aden alls 3. T. petraeum
2. I. nitens
4. Seed with 2 lateral furrows which converge with central furrow on ventral
surface at base; staminate inflorescence 3-5 cm long; leaflets usually
DIO hag ecnt a ott 4 hag URI BAGS tte tiie twee ml, lee 4. T. thorsborneorum
seed with 2 lateral furrows which converge with central furrow on ventral
surface towards centre of seed; staminate inflorescence usually more
than 6 cm long; leaflets usually 7-11 ................ 5. I. pisicarpum
1. Tetrastigma crenatum B.R. Jackes species nova affinis speciebus novoguineensibus T
lauterbachiano Gilg et T. papilloso (Blume) Planchon autem differt foliis trifo-
liolatis marginibus crenato-serrulatis, pilis uniseriatis multicellularibus in costa
infra et papillis parvis in lamina consociata praeditis, floribus in caulibus vetioribus
portatis et lenticellis prominentibus in caulibus vetis ornatis. Typus: Queensland.
Cook District: Cardstone via Tully, 17°45’S, 145°37’E, 3 April 1984, EM. Jackes,
" rainforest vine. Flowers minute, greenish on old wood. Red loam”. (holo: BRI:
iso: CANB,K,L,NSW).
Slender vine climbing over rainforest trees; stems lenticellate striate, with uniseriate
multicellular hairs present on young stems; lenticels rounded, pustular with margins
forming hollow peg-like protuberances to 3 mm long on older stems. Tendrils bifid.
Leaves trifoliolate; leaflets glabrous above, lower with sparse uniseriate multicellular hairs
confined to midrib and base of main laterals; papillae associated chiefly with the upper
midrib and veins on the lower surface; margins crenate-serrulate: central leaflet broadly
lanceolate, apex acuminate, base shortly angustate, (13.2~)14.8(-18) cm x (6.8—)7.4(-8.5)
cm; laterals lanceolate, slightly oblique at the base, (10.7-)11.9(-14) cm x (3.2~)5.9(-
6.4) cm. Petiole often sparsely pubescent, 6-10 cm long; central petiolule striate with 2
shallow grooves on upper surface, 1.7-2.3 cm long, lateral petiolules similar, 0.6-1 cm
long. Stipules triangular, borne at right angles to the stem, 4-5 mm X 3-4 mm: margins
papillate. Inflorescence borne on older wood; bracts prominent, several often clustered:
uniseriate hairs present on branches. Staminate inflorescence not seen. Pistillate inflo-
rescence with congested terminal umbels 6-7 cm long; pedicels pubescent, c. 1 mm long;
calyx c. 0.25 mm long, with 4 small pubescent lobes; corolla c. 1-1.25 mm long, greenish,
Jackes, 7etrastigma 151
pubescent, with lobes cucullate and extended to form a pouch near the apex, not strongly
reflexed: ovary conical, c. 0.5 mm long; style short, stigmatic lobes narrow. Fruit not
seen. Fig. 1A-B; Fig. 2A-D.
Representative specimens: Queensland. Cook District: Ryker’s Track, Cape Tribulation, Oct 1982, Jackes
(BRIL.CBG,NSW), Mossman Gorge, Jul 1976, Jackes (BRI,CANB,QRS); Babinda, 17°20’S, 145°55’E, May 1978,
Jazo (QRS).
Specimens from 5 localities examined.
Distribution and habitat: This species (Map 1) has been found only between Cape
Tribulation to the north and the Tully area to the south, in complex mesophyll vine
forest between sea level and 200 m altitude.
Phenology: Flowers have been collected in April and May; male flowers and fruits have
not yet been collected.
Notes and observations: This species is related to 7. /auterbachianum, from which it
may be distinguished by the smaller pistillate inflorescence and the leaves which do not
have uniseriate hairs on the abaxial surface, only small papillae being associated with
the midrib, and to 7. papillosum which has glabrous leaves. I could not distinguish
between specimens of 7. /auterbachianum and T. gilgianum, and hence regard these as
synonymous. Flowering is apparently irregular. It took five years of regular visits to two
populations to obtain flowering material! Plants grown from cuttings took two years to
flower in Townsville. Adventitious roots on the cuttings emerged through the lenticular
protuberances.
Fig. 1. Tetrastigma crenatum: A. \eaf x 0.5. B. pistillate inflorescence borne on old wood X I.
Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Be
ee
Fig. 2. Tetrastigma crenatum: A. portion of stem showing pustular lenticels. B. buds of female flowers. C. open
female flower. D. ovary with expanded 4-lobed stigma and staminodes. All scale bars equal 0.5 mm.
The specific epithet was chosen because this is the only
| ustralian species
with crenate-serrulate leaf margins.
Planchon in C. DC., Monogr. phan. 5: 427 (1887):
ragm. 2: 73 (1861), 6: 178 (1868). pe: Clarence
E EL 540130),P); Hastings River, Beckler (syn:
540142)); Macleay Beckler (syn: MEL(MI P).
obust vine; mature stems lenticellate, usually flattened, thickened at the nodes, glabrous
lenticels elongated, often with raised margins. Tendrils simple or bifid. Leaves trifoliolate:
leaflets thinly coriaceous, glabrous; margins undulate or slightly revolute with 4-6 shallow
teeth present on both sides of the lamina, often prominent on juvenile leaves, rarely
Vitis nitens
3eckler (syn:
a
*
Jackes, Tetrastigma [53
entire; central leaflet broadly lanceolate, apex acuminate, base shortly angustate, (9-
)11.9(-15) cm X (4.5-)6.3(—7) cm; lateral leaflets lanceolate, slightly oblique at base, (7.5-
)9.3(-12.2) cm X (3.6-)4.8(-7) cm. Petiole shallowly grooved, often swollen at junction
with stem, (1.5-)3.9(—5.8) cm long; central petiolule striate, shallowly grooved above,
1-3.2 cm long; lateral petiolules 0.2-1.8 cm long. Stipules triangular, c. 3 mm X 3 mm,
glabrous. Inflorescence with prominent bracts, and sometimes small uniseriate papillae.
Staminate inflorescence with 1-3 peduncles per axil, 4-6 cm long; pedicels 3-4 mm long;
calyx spreading, c. 0.5 mm long; corolla c. 2 mm X 1 mm; flaments c. 1 mm long;
anthers triangular-ovate, c. 0.5 mm long; ovary much reduced and almost covered by
the disc. Pistillate inflorescence with | peduncle per axil rarely more, 2-3 cm long;
pedicels 1-2 mm long; calyx spreading, c. 0.5 mm long; corolla creamy-green, c. 3 mm
x 1.5 mm: lobes strongly reflexed after anthesis; staminodes present; ovary conical;
stigma sessile, lobes ciliolate, spreading. Berry ovoid to ellipsoid, purplish-black to black
at maturity, 1.2-1.5 mm x 1-1.3 mm; seeds ovoid, [-1.1 cm X 0.6-0.9 cm; | or 2(-4)
= fruit; endosperm in transverse section broken by the convoluted endotesta. Fig. 3A-
Representative specimens: Queensland. Cook District: 0.5 miles {[c. 1 km] NW of Stuckies Gap, Bloomfield
River area, 15°50’S, 143°19’E, May 1969, Webb & Tracey 8936 (BRI); Little Mulgrave Creek crossing near
Gordonvale, May 1979, Jackes (A,BRI,CANB,CBG,JCT,K,L,MEL,NSW,QRS). NORTH KENNEDY DISTRICT: Herv-
ey’s Range W of Townsville, 19°20’S, 146°29’E, Jan 1978, Jackes (L,LPERTH). SOUTH KENNEDY DISTRICT:
Dalrymple Heights and vicinity, Jun-Nov 1947, Clemens (BRI,K). Port Curtis District: Rockhampton,
1863-1865, Dietrich (BM,PR). MORETON DistRICT: Blackall Range, May 1977, Byrnes 3524 (BRD; Mt. Greville,
Jun 1963, Fyerist 7253 (BRI,.K). New South Wales. NortH Coast: Sandiland Ranges, Nov 1904, Boorman
(NSW); Mt. Elaine, c. 12 miles [c. 20 km] SE of Grafton, Nov 1956, Constable (NSW); Manning River, 5 miles
[c. 8.2 km]) NW of Burdook, Dec 1953, Johnson (K,NSW); Cabbage Tree Island, offshore island east of Port
Stephens, Jan 1969, Mfartensz (CANB). NORTHERN TABLELANDS: Platypus Ck., New England National Park, Dec
1960, Williams (NE). CENTRAL Coast: Martinvale, Nov 1965, Blaxell (NSW).
Specimens from 91 localities examined.
Distribution and habitat: This species (Map 2) is found in an area extending from south
of Cooktown to around Sydney, chiefly in vine forest and along moist gullies. It occurs
on a variety of soil types.
Phenology: Flowering occurs mainly in winter but flowers have been collected until
midsummer. Fruits have been collected throughout the year.
Notes and observations: This widespread species shows affinities with 7. /anceolarium,
which occurs in Papua New Guinea, but may be distinguished from it by the broader
leaves and larger fruits. It is closely related to 7. petraeum which has smaller broader
leaves and prefers drier inland habitats.
3. Tetrastigma petraeum B.R. Jackes species nova affinis 7. nitenti (F. Muell.) Planchon
a quo foliis brevioribus latioribusque et fructibus parvioribus distinguitur, et
addite areas siccas [exempli gratia dumetum cum plantis volubilibus (‘vine thicket’)
et silvam apertam] praeopta. Typus: Queensland. NORTH KENNEDY DISTRICT:
Walleroo Hill, 3 miles [c. 4.8 km] SW of Cashmere crossing, Herbert River,
18°08’S, 145°20’E, 30 March 1980, E.M. Jackes, “vine thicket on basaltic outcrop”
(holo: BRI; iso: CANB,L,NSW).
A robust scrambling vine; stems striate to rounded, thickened at nodes, glabrous. Tendrils
simple or shortly bifid. Leaves trifoliolate; leaflets coriaceous, glossy above but may be
yellowish near marginal teeth; both surfaces glabrous; margins with 4-6 small mucronate
teeth usually present, rarely entire; central leaflet broadly elliptical, apex acuminate to
shortly caudate, base often truncate, (6-)6.5(-9) cm X (3.5-)4.5(-6.3) cm; lateral leaflets
broadly elliptical, slightly oblique at base, (5.3-)5.6(-7.5) cm X (3.5-)4(-5.5) cm. Petiole
striate, 1.8-4 cm long; central petiolule striate, 1.5—2 cm long; lateral petiolules 0.3-0.4
cm long. Stipules triangular, carried at right angles to the stem, revolute, c. 3 mm X 2.5
mm, glabrous. Inflorescence bracts inconspicuous. Staminate inflorescence not seen.
Pistillate inflorescence 2-3 cm long, glabrous; pedicels c. 3 mm long; calyx truncate c.
0.5 mm long; corolla creamy-green, 2-3 mm X 1.5 mm; lobes strongly reflexed after
anthesis; staminodes present, aborted anther reduced and awl-shaped; ovary conical, 1.5-
2 mm long: stigma sessile, lobes ciliolate, spreading. Berry ovoid, black at maturity, 0.9-
1.2 cm X 0.7-1 cm: seeds ovoid, 6-7 mm X 3.5 mm; usually 2 per fruit. Endosperm in
transverse section much dissected by the convoluted endotesta. Fig. 3E-H, Fig. 5A-B.
154 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
Representative specimens: Queensland. Cook District: Granite Creek, Mareeba, 17°05’S, 145°21’E, Jul 1985,
Jackes (A,BRI,CANB,K,L,MEL,NSW,QRS); Near Lancelot Mine, Silver Valley, Ravenshoe, Jul 1978, Lockyer
(CBG). NorTH KENNEDY District: 3 km W of “Gregory Springs” Station, [19°40’S, 144°22’E, Oct 1984, Jackes
(JCT,MEL); “Lochwall” Station, Charters Towers, Dec 1977, Adarsh [AQ441436] (BRI).
Specimens from 7 localities examined.
Distribution and habitat: This species is found in open forest and vine thickets (Map 2)
where it is often growing over rocks. Soils are variable.
Fig. 3. Tetrastigma nitens: A. leaf with staminate inflorescence X 0.5. B. seed, ventral surface showing the position
of the raphe < 5. C. seed, dorsal surface showing the position of the perichalaza x 5. D. median transverse
section of mature seed X 5. Tetrastigma petracunt. E. leaf with pistillate inflorescence < 0.5. F. seed, ventral
surface showing the position of the raphe X 5. G. seed, dorsal surface showing the position of the perichalaza X
5. H. median transverse section of mature seed. (e — lignified endotesta: s - endosperm.)
Jackes, Tetrastigma 155
Phenology: Flowers have been collected in March and fruits throughout the year.
Notes and observations: This species is easily distinguished from the closely related 7.
nitens by the broadly elliptical almost ovoid leaves, which are also shorter than in that
species, the smaller less pulpy berries and its habitat. Male flowers have not been seen.
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the species’ habit of growing over rocks exposed
to the sun.
4. Tetrastigma thorsborneorum B.R. Jackes species nova affine 7. pisicarpo (Miq.)
Planchon a quo fructibus grandioribus globulo-ovoideis caesionigris ubi maturis,
seminibus ovoideis, sulcis lateralibus duobus convergentibus in sulcum centralem
a raphe in pagina ventrali prope basem seminis factum ornatis, foliolis plerumque
paucioribus et inflorescentia staminata robustioribus distinguitur, et a speciebus
australianis ceteris foliis pedatis differt. Typus: Queensland. NORTH KENNEDY
DisTRIicT: Gustav Creek, Nelly Bay, Magnetic Island, 19°09’S, 146°51’E, 15 March
1985, B.R. Jackes ‘“‘closed forest, vine, flowers white’? (holo: BRI; iso:
A,CANB,K,L,MEL,NSW).
A robust vine; stems glabrous, lenticellate, rounded initially, becoming flattened with
age: lenticels prominent. Tendrils bifid. Leaves pedate, with 5-7({-11) leaflets; leaflets
firm, dark glossy green; both surfaces glabrous; margins irregularly toothed with 5 or 6
teeth on either side of the lamina; central leaflet elliptical, apex acuminate, base shortly
attenuate, (12-)13(-18) cm X (4.3-)6(-8.5) cm; lateral leaflets elliptical, proportionally
smaller, oblique at the base, particularly the lowest leaflets. Petiole rounded, (5.5—)6.6(-
11) cm long; lIenticels prominent even before leaf is fully expanded; central petiolule
rounded, lenticels often obvious, (1-)2.7(—4.2) cm long; lateral petiolules (0.5-—)1.8(-—3.3)
cm long. Stipules triangular, c. 2.5 mm X 2 mm. Inflorescence bracts inconspicuous;
scattered papillae present on pedicels. Staminate inflorescence robust, 3-5 cm long; calyx
spreading, c. 0.5 mm long, papillose; corolla whitish, c. 2 mm X 1.5 mm, cucullate at
the apex, lobes strongly reflexed; filaments c. 1.5 mm long, anthers c. 0.5 mm long.
Pistillate inflorescence 3.5-5.7 cm long; pedicels 3 mm long; calyx as for male flower;
corolla 2.5 mm X 1.5 mm; aborted anthers triangular; ovary broadly conical, c. 1.5 mm
long; stigma sessile, lobes spreading, ciliolate. Berry globular to ovoid, bluish black to
black at maturity, 0.9-1.2 cm X 0.7-1 cm; seeds ovoid, c. 7 mm X 6 mm; 1 per fruit;
furrows on the ventral surface converge at base of seed; endosperm in transverse section
much dissected by the convoluted endotesta. Fig. 4A—E, Fig. 5C-D.
Representative specimens: Queensland. Cook District: Tozer Gap, Jun 1983, Morton (JCT); Chester River,
13°40’S, 143°25’E, Jul 1977, Hyland 9455 (QRS); Wallaby Creek, S of Cooktown, Jun 1982, Jackes (BRI,CANB).
NortH KENNEDY District: Murray Upper, 18°00’S, 145°00’E, Jun 1977, Cooke (DNA,QRS); Cardwell, Sep 1978,
A. & M. Thorsborne (BRI). SouTH KENNEDY District: Airlie Beach, Nov 1982, Jackes (JCT).
Specimens from 14 localities examined.
Distribution and habitat: This species occurs (Map 1) along the eastern Queensland
coastline from Tozer Gap in Cape York Peninsula as far south as Airlie Beach (20°16’S,
148°44’E) between sea level and 300 m, and is commonly found along streams in vine
forest. Soils are variable.
Phenology: Flowers have been collected in autumn and fruits in winter and early spring.
Notes and observations: This species is easily distinguished by its firm, pedate leaves
with leaflets with irregularly toothed margins, and numerous conspicuous lenticels on
the petiole even before the lamina is fully expanded. The number of leaflets per leaf is
variable even on the one plant, but the number most frequently encountered is 5-7.
Fruits are reported to be eaten by the fig bird (J. Wieneke, pers. comm.). It 1s closely
related to 7. pisicarpum which occurs in Papua New Guinea; however, the latter has
thinner usually smaller leaves, less prominent lenticels on the petioles, the staminate
inflorescence is longer and on the specimens examined appears to be more fragile and
easily broken when dry. The furrows on the ventral surface of the seed converge about
midway along the seed rather than at its base.
Etymology: This species is named for Margaret and Arthur Thorsborne of Cardwell, who
collected the first fertile material of it, in recognition of their contribution to biology in
the Rockingham Bay area.
i989
3
=
i
Austrobaileya 3(1)
156
=
Mh Babe ek aw ~rnm ott
ld 1 ay Mt ba
uM by HL Pgh
w
1 ai
bee
ing
f the perichalaza
cotyledons and first leaf x 0.5.
raphe and the lateral furrows X 5. (e—-
=
O
cm
ort
a
O
ofS
—
ca
ow
— 2
28
5
= OF
3
roy
2 wo
ns
a2
aa ry
wy = ob
ook
iz
x 50
woe
ie:
o'r oo
Set
oRES
Sage
oY go
SOY
Oo
a ar
om c
. = ea
A. leaf with stam
F. seed, ventral surface show
D
ie
“xX
ee
ag
xa
ww
25
O —
beret
=e
Ton
we
f°
iy eS
Sa8°¢
tal ood
a —
o = ® o)
wea g &
ee Oo
86&.,'3c
Se Sue
i OO > me VY
S828.
tne Weigel
~s sm”
Sr ssa
Sm Ue
dow FS ©
Set 8 OO
goDpSs
~ectoye
"Wad i tad
= aE oO
pr ines
be SS » SO
.nuQ~ o
+3" 8e
soon &
ae © od
Boxe
Jlanchon in A.
us. lugd.-bat. 1: 79
(1863).
stems rounded, lenticellate; bark flaky; lenticels dotted.
res ped h (7-)9(-11) leaflets; leaflets thin, drying somewhat like
entral leaflet elliptical, apex shortly acute, base acute, 6-12 ¢ 3-7 cm: lateral le
elliptical, proportionally smaller, oblique at the base. Petiole striate, 10-10.5 c
lenticels inconspicuous until lamina fully expanded; central petiolule 3-5 c
ong. sta
pedicels thin and narrow, in the dry state a
Berry obovoid to elliptical, blackish at maturity, 0.8-0.9 X 0.6-0.7 c
ovoid, c. 5-6 mm X 6-7 - 1 per fruit; lateral furrows converge on the ventral surface
with the central furrow at about the |
onesia. 1869, Zollinger (K); de Vogel 5059 (Ks).
long;
long; lateral
inate inflorescence with flattened branches exceeding 6
opearing to be easily
ener
inea. New Guinea, Forbes
ST RINSE eee
TAS
= BE oe
Os
pes
Fig. 5. Tetrastigma petraeum: A. unopened bud of female flower. B. open female flower. Jetrastigma thorsbor-
neorum: C. open male flower and bud. D. side view of open male flower showing reduced ovary surrounded by
the disc. All scale bars equal 0.5 mm.
158 Austrobatleya 3(1): 1989
Vegetative material and material with immature staminate inflorescences collected
from the Lockerbie Scrub area at the top of Cape York Peninsula appears to belong to
this species. Confirmation of this identification at this stage is not possible because no
mature flowering or fruiting material has been seen. All specimens examined have usually
had between 7 and 11 leaflets per leaf and the leaflets are thin so that even tertiary
veins are easily seen on fresh material; lenticels are relatively inconspicuous on all but
old petioles. The collection by Gray 4295 bears young staminate inflorescences. Although
not fully mature, the buds are considerably smaller than buds of T. thorsborneorum
which are somewhat younger, and the top of the ovary and stigma are projecting well
above the disc. |
[Bamaga Rd, 8 km S of Cape York,10°45’/S, 142°31’E, Feb 1986, Gray 4295 (JCT,QRS); Between Lockerbie and
Somerset, 10°46’S, 142°30’E, May 1981, Hyland 21138V (JCT,QRS); Carnegie Range, Apr 1984, Jackes (JCT):
(BRT I3taioy Jul 1986, Jackes (JCT); South of Bamaga, 27 km SW of Cape York, Oct 1965, Smith 12603
1412)j.
Acknowledgements
_ [am indebted to Mr L. Pedley for kindly preparing the Latin diagnoses. The
assistance of the Directors of Herbaria who loaned specimens and/or allowed me access
to their collections is much appreciated. To my husband and those who went out of
their way to try to obtain fertile material of several species, a sincere ‘thank you’ — your
job is still unfinished! Mrs H. Winsor prepared the the Scanning Electron Micrographs.
References
JACKES, B.R. (1984). Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 1. Aympelocissus Planchon. Austrobaileya 2(1): 81-86.
JACKES, B.R. (1987). Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 2. Cayratia Juss. Austrobaileya 2(4): 365-379.
JACKES, B.R. (1988a). Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 3. Cissus L. Austrobaileya 2(5): 481-505.
JACKES, B.R. (1988b). A Key to the Genera of the Australian Vitaceae. Proceedings Ecological Society of Australia
Lor 2y il.
JACKES, B.R. (1989). Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 4. Clematicissus Planchon. Austrebaileya 3(1): 101-
102.
WEBB, L.J. (1978). A general classification of Australian Rainforests. Australian Plants 9: 349-363.
Accepted for publication 28 April 1989
(
Maps 1-2. 1. @? Tetrastigma pisicarpum;, @ T. thorsborneorum, * T. crenatum. 2. @ Tetrastigma nitens, * T.
petraeum.
Austrobaileya 3(1): 159-161 (1989) 159
NOTES
Eriocaulon longifolium Nees ex Kunth (Eriocaulaceae), a new record for Australia
Bentham (1878) stated that Eriocaulon australe R. Br. is “The largest of the
Australian species’. Certainly F. australe has the largest plants of the Australian species
of Eriocaulon and with leaves to 80 cm long and peduncles to 100 cm long it 1s readily
distinguished from other Australian species, the majority of which have plants which
are mostly less than 25 cm high. In the absence of any recent treatment of Australian
Eriocaulon, Bentham’s account contains the only Australia-wide key for identification
of Australian material of this genus. This situation appears to have led to the identification
of all material from tall plants with long leaves as E. australe, based solely on the size
of the plant.
Examination of some unidentified material at NI and DNA by the author in
preparation for a revision of the genus in Australia led to the identification of some
robust specimens as E. /ongifolium Nees ex Kunth using the accounts of Eriocaulon by
van Royen (1959) and Ruhland (1903). The superficial similarity of this material to that
of E. australe was apparent. Examination of further material from BRI and NSW
confirmed that two species were indeed represented by specimens identified as FE. australe
in Australia. Australian specimens thought to belong to E. /ongifolium were found to be
conspecific with material under that name from Malesia and also matched material cited
by van Royen (1959). The type does not appear to have been examined by van Royen
nor has it yet been seen by the author; however, based on the descriptions and illustration,
the species is readily identified. E. /ongifolium has thus been collected in Australia as
early as 1937 (Flecker s.n. [AQ200288] BRI).
The important distinguishing features of the two species are summarised in the
key below. Distribution of each of the two taxa in Australia is shown in Map 1. 2&.
longifolium is also widely distributed through Malesia, India and Madagascar while &.
australe is also recorded from New Guinea.
1. Leaves pubescent at base; heads 7-10.5 mm _ wide; involucral bracts
pubescent at base; receptacle pubescent with long hyaline hairs; flowers
TPEPVIELOUIS: Selene tee a. zp tae to ce i atl lame oo fle acetal oS “eS E. australe
Leaves mostly glabrous, rarely slightly pubescent at base; heads 4-6 mm
wide; involucral bracts glabrous; receptacle glabrous; flowers
dimerous.. .. 8% en carer ee ere anemia E. longifolium
Index to collectors of material examined
(1 = E. australe, 2 = E. longifolium)
Aston, H.1. 2668, 2; Bell, C. 380, 1; Blake, S.T. 2142, i; 2424, 1; 4989, 1; Brass, L.J. 2266, 1; 7603, 2; 7936, 1;
7951, 1: 8576, 1; 8638, 1; Brooker, M.1. 4093, 1; Clark, M.J. 1597, 1: Clarkson, J.R. 1046, 1; 2878, 1; Constable,
E.F. NSW22205, 1: Coveny, R. 347, 1; 3525, i; 6954, 1; Dunlop, CR. 3448, 2. 4399, 2; Durrington, L. 1441, |;
Dodson, J. s.n., x.1971, 1; Enoh, M. 327, 2; Fensham, R. 262, 2: 316, 2: Flecker, H. AQ200288, 2; NSW52582,
1: Fosberg, F.R. 62369, 2; Harrold, A.G. 182, 1; Hearne, D.A. 1544, 2: Henshall, T.S. 1835, 2; 3811, 2; Henty,
E.E. NGF38676, 1; NGF49406, 1; Higgins, R.L. s.n., ii.1919, 1; Himson, A. 55, 1; Hubbard, C.E. 3350, 1;
Ingram, C.K. NSW63344, 1; Johnson, L.A.S. NSW17733, 1: Latz, P.K. 3407, 2; Leach, GJ. 1400, 2; 1529, 2
2172, 2; 2307, 2; Levitt, D. 409, 2; Lucas, O.H. NSW58390, 1; Maiden, J.H. NSW58392, 1; Mckee, H.S. 9499,
i: McGillivray, D.J. 1892, 1; Michael, N. 370, 1; Mondi 278, 2: Morton, A.G. 755, 1; Must, J. 1642, 2; O°Gower,
A.K. NSW209445, 1; Ridsdale, C.E. NGF33583, 1; Robinson, A.C. s.n., 20.1.1975, 1; Royen, P. van 4872, 1;
Russell-Smith, J. 2101, 2; 2756, 2; 4422, 1; Scarth-Johnson, V. 833A, 1: Scortechini, s.n., s.d., 1; Shah, M. 571,
2: Sharpe, P.R. 129, 1; 1149, 1; 1646, 1; 1829, 1; 3970, 1; Simmonds, J.H. s.n., xii.1887, 1; Specht, R.L. 890, 1;
Stocker, G. 680, 2; Thorsborne, A. 185, 1; 268, 2; Waddy, J. 562, 2; White, C.T. s.n., 111.1915, 1; 1v.1915, 1;
Whitehouse, F.W. s.n., s.d., 2; Wightman, G.M. 908, 2: Womersley, J.S. NGF6882, 1; NGF9344, 1; NGF9354,
1: Wrigley, J.W. 368, 1.
Acknowledgements
The Directors of BRI, NSW and PERTH are gratefully acknowledged for the loan
of specimens.
160 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
126 130
#40 T&O0
— —=
1290 139
Map 1. Distribution of FE. australe (A) and E. longifolium (B).
Leach, Eriocaulon longifolium 161
References
BENTHAM, G. (1878). Eriocaulon. Floa australiensis 7: 190-198. London: Lovell Reeve & Co.
ROYEN, P. VAN (1959). Sertuluim papianum LL. Eriocaulaceae. Nova Guinea (n.s.) 10: 21-44.
RUHLAND, W. (1903). Eriocaulaceae. In Engler, A. (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich. IV, 13. Facsimile ed. Weinheim:
Engelmann-Cramer.
G.J. Leach
Northern Territory Herbarium
Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory
P.O. Box 496 Palmerston Northern Territory 0831
Accepted for publication 14 April 1989
Austrobaileya 3(1): 163-165 (1989) 163
PLANT PROFILE
Austrobaileya scandens C. White
Among the extant primitive angiosperms, the Austrobaileyaceae constitute, accord-
ing to Endress (1980), one of the systematically most isolated and geographically most
restricted Dicotyledonous families. Austrobaileya scandens, its only member, is a woody
vine endemic to the tropical rainforest of north Queensland. It was first discovered in
1929 by S.F. Kajewski when he was collecting for the Arnold Arboretum, USA. White
(1933) described it as a new genus and species of the family Magnoliaceae, but after
detailed research Croizat (1943) erected the new family Austrobaileyaceae for it in
recognition of its unique systematic position. Subsequent authors have followed this
suggestion. White (1948) described a second species, but, for reasons detailed below, it
is considered conspecific with A. scandens.
Austrobaileya scandens C. White, Contr. Arn. Arb. 4: 29 (1933). Type: Queensland.
Cook District: Boonjie, Atherton Tableland, 10 October 1929, S.F. Kajewski
1629 (holo: BRI).
Austrobaileya maculata C. White, J. Arn. Arb. 29: 255 (1948). Type: Queensland.
Cook District: Mt Spurgeon, September 1936, C.T. White 10734 (holo: BRI’).
Robust glabrous vine of rainforest canopy. Stems and older branches lenticellate; young
branchlets smooth, flattened, sometimes somewhat glaucous, often with narrow decurrent
lines, sometimes extending into narrow wings. Leaves opposite or subopposite, simple;
lamina leathery, smooth, bluish green, + shiny above, oblong-ovate or oblong to narrowly
ovate, 4.5-20 cm long, 2-9 cm wide; apex abruptly acuminate, the point itself 5-10 mm
long; base generally rounded to broadly cuneate; margins narrowly recurved; nervation
of midrib + flat or slightly recessed above, broad and somewhat raised below, 4.8
secondary nerves looping out towards margin on each side of midrib, and interstitial
reticulate venation prominent on both sides of lamina. Flowers solitary in leaf axils,
pedunculate; peduncles 7-15 mm long, clothed in small scattered bracts; bracts broadly
ovate, 1-2 mm long. Flowers + pendent, with a foetid odour to attract pollenator flies,
c. 5-6 cm diameter, exhibiting spiral phyllotaxis, bisexual. Tepals 11-23, greatly over-
lapping, varying much in shape and size, though outermost smallest, 5.5-30 mm long,
6-21 mm wide: outer tepals glossy green, + circular, inner creamish green with red-
purple dots, broadly oblong to obovate, margins very thin, irregularly denticulate.
Androecium consisting of stamens and (inner) staminodes, all creamish, papillose,
irregularly dotted with dark purple; stamens 7-11, laminar, varying in shape from
relatively flat to strongly boat-shaped depending on the position in the whorl, 14-17
mm long, 5-9 mm broad, with apex from almost acute or truncate to rounded, innermost
stamens approach staminodes in outline; ventral surface of stamen with 2 bisporangiate
thecae 3-5 mm long, each theca opening by a_ longitudinal slit, staminodes
9-16, 15-17 mm long, narrow, plicate or irregularly ridged. Gynoecium consisting of 8
or 9 free carpels 6.5-9 mm long; ovary c. 3 mm long, containing 4~14 ovules arranged
alternately in 2 longitudinal rows; styles c. 6 mm long, with canal exuding mucilage, all
converging apically and at anthesis tips embedded in a massive mucilage cap; stigma
transversely bilobed. Only a few carpels in each flower develop to maturity. Fruits
stalked, fleshy, orange-yellow, ellipsoid to globose berries, c. 5-7 cm long, 4..5 cm broad;
stalk 1.5-2 cm long. Seeds whitish, often lenticular. Fig. 1.
Distribution and habitat: This species has been collected from Mt Spurgeon in the Mt
Carbine Tableland area, south to the Atherton Tableland and vicinity of Ravenshoe,
and to the Downey Creek area and south to the Walter Hill Range near Tully. Though
collections of it are not numerous, it could be expected to occur over a wide area of the
wet tropics in both lowland and higher altitude rainforest. It is usually found as a canopy
vine growing to the crowns of trees 10-15 m tall.
Conservation status: In a number of areas the species has been recorded as locally
common, but since it is a vine of the canopy it is not often noticed. It is not considered
164
Austrobatleya 3(1): 1989
‘
-#
rf
i
:
3
trp Mert has Parnas ataae,
~~
gy
anh
re Re die Mert oa a
eats
RLS
iy
as
“a4 ereese
Fig. 1. Austrobaileya scandens. A. leaf X 0.5. B. flower X 1. C. fruit X 1. A, Webb & Tracey 6562; B, Jessup 884
& McDonald {in spirit); C, Jessup & Guymer GJM 2774 (in spirit). All at BRI.
Ross, Austrobaileya scandens 165
to be rare and threatened, and has been recorded from national parks through much of
its range.
Notes: Although Telford (1983) mentions two species, viz A. scandens and A. maculata,
other authorities (e.g. Endress 1980) consider there to be only one in the genus. Collections
at BRI show the key characters listed by White (1948) for separating his two species are
unreliable. The leaf shape varies from lanceolate to oblong on the one branchlet; flowers
on both type specimens have densely papillose stamens and staminodes; and as Endress
(1980) pointed out, the shape of each stamen’s apex depends on its position within the
spiral. On the basis of this evidence, the taxa previously included under A. scandens
and A. maculata are thus regarded as conspecific, and A. scandens, being the older name,
should be used for the species concerned.
Acknowledgements
I extend my thanks to L.W. Jessup, W.J.F. McDonald and G.P. Guymer for
providing excellent specimens from which W.A. Smith prepared the illustrations, and
for constructive comment on the manuscript.
References
CROIZAT, L. (1943). New families. Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 15: 64.
ENDRESS, P.K. (1980). The reproductive structures and s stematic position of the Austrobaileyaceae. Botanische
Jahrbucher fiir Systematic, Pflanzengeschichte und P. anzengeographie, 101: 393-433.
TELFORD, I. (1983). Austrobaileyaceae. In Morley, B.D. & Toelken, H.R. (eds), Flowering Plants in Australia.
Adelaide: Rigby.
WHITE, C.T. (1933). Ligneous plants collected for the Arnold Arboretum in North Queensland by S.F. Kajewski
in 1929. Contributions from the Arnold Arboretum 4. {-1%3.
WHITE, C.T. (1948). A new species of Austrobaileya (Austrobaileyaceae) from Australia. Journal of the Arnold
Arboretum 29: 255-256.
E.M. Ross
Queensland Herbarium, Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068
Austrobaileya 3(1): 167-171 (1989) 167
BOOK REVIEWS
W.D. Clayton & S.A. Renvoize. Genera Graminum — Grasses of the World, Kew Bulletin
Additional Series XIII. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1986. 389 pp,
24 figures. No price quoted, but available in Australia for c. $58.
A review of this book has previously been published with reference to the effect
‘t has on the classification of the grass genera of southern Africa (de Winter 1987). A
further review with reference to the Australian genera is appropriate. As mentioned by
de Winter the Kew herbarium is certainly an excellent venue at which to compile a
contemporary account of the world’s genera, combining as it does a long tradition of
taxonomic and anatomical research together with a fine world-wide collection and library.
The considerable fund of knowledge established by agrostologists Stapf, Hubbard and
Bor and anatomist Metcalf have been brought to fruition in a succinct way by the
morphological and general contributions of Clayton and the anatomical summaries of
Renvoize.
The circumscription of genera of this world treatment nevertheless needs closer
scrutiny, particularly in regions where local experience and field knowledge has been
accumulated. In the case of southern Africa for example, de Winter questions the wisdom
of placing fairly unique genera such as Stiburus and Diandrochloa into synonymy with
Eragrostis or the recently established segregate arundinoid genera of southern Africa
(Conert 1987) into synonymy with Rytidosperma, itself a fairly dubious split from the
cosmopolitan genus Danthonia. In the Australian context there are similar examples e.g.
the placing of Thellungia into synonymy with Eragrostis and the sinking of Pseudopo-
gonatherum with Eulalia despite the fact that the former genus has paired pedicelled
spikelets and a distinctly awned upper slume. Overall the tendancy seems to have been
to adopt an attitude of combining genera ©.g. Diplachne with Leptochloa, Scrotochioa
with Leptaspis, Beckeropsis with Pennisetum, Diectomis with Andropogon and the exam-
ples given above, although the cases for segregating these genera in the first place have
been fairly lucidly and logically gone into e.g. Judziewicz (1984) where Scrotochloa 1s
separated from Leptaspis by 1) seemingly good characters. The recent generic splits in
the Triticeae (Léve 1984, Dewey 1984), based to a large extent on genomic characters,
although with a slight degree of morphological back-up, have been virtually ignored.
On the other hand the lumping process may not have gone far enough e.g. the
recent treatment of Mnesithea (Veldkamp et al. 1987), where four of the genera treated
as separate in Genera Graminum have been sunk under Mnesithea, but the rationale
for doing so is fairly clearly explained. In a similar vein is the recent placing of most
of Australia’s Brachiaria species and Panicum maximum in Urochloa (Webster 1987),
which at first examination does not seem plausible, but has some support at the level
of type of C4 leaf anatomy (Hattersley 1987). However the last three papers were
published since Genera Graminum, giving an indication of the amount of work currently
being undertaken on generic limits in the Poaceae.
In the main however Clayton and Renvoize have done a magnificent task of
summarizing the contemporary scene of how the world’s genera are constituted and
classified. They present their own views and would be the first to admit that their work
does not represent the last word in this area. Since their book was published a fair
number of genera have either been published or are in the pipeline and others have
been placed in synonymy. The trend will probably continue as generic limits are currently
being researched with increasing vigour, a reflection of this activity being the symposium
on grass classification and evolution in Washington in 1986 (Soderstrom ef al, 1987). A
recently published review on taxonomy in the tropics (Ng 1988) maintains there is a
high degree of subjectivity in the way we circumscribe our taxa, and this is certainly
reflected by the lack of agreement by grass taxonomists as to generic boundaries in many
genera. Ng asserts that the percentage disagreement of taxonomists working on the same
sroup of plants “may range between 5 and 30%” This subjective element certainly
accounts for the difference of opinion between agrostologists on the question of generic
limits.
168 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
In his review de Winter summmarizes well the contents of the book that there is
not much point repeating that here. Some final comments of the review in terms of the
great benefits of this compilation are however worth re-stating. “The authors have in
the Genera Graminum brought together a vast amount of information and successfully
summarized progress made during the last decades in grass taxonomy. All agrostologists
are in their debt. In the light of the strongly traditional, and not entirely consistent
approach followed, a ‘modern’ synthesis of the generic classification of the grasses has,
in my opinion, not been fully achieved. This is most likely what the authors themselves
meant to convey when they advised the reader that ‘...there is something here to annoy
everyone, so do not bother to chastise - think rather to improve.’ We await a definitive
treatment of grass genera in the future.” Whether this is a possible goal in view of the
degree of subjectivity in our methods of circumscribing genera, is debatable. However
techniques of accumulating data (Watson 1987) and analyzing it cladistically (Kellogg
1987) and phenetically (Baum 1987) with the aid of computers, give hope for the future.
References
BAUM, B.R. (1987). Numerical taxonomic analyses of the Poaceae. In Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu, K.W., Campbell,
C.S. & Barkworth, M.E., Grass Systematics and Evolution, pp 334-342. Washington, D.C. & London:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
CONERT, H.J. (1987). Current concepts in the systematics of the Arundinoideae. In Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu,
K.W., Campbell, C.S. & Barkworth, M.E., Grass Systematics and Evolution, pp 239~250. Washington, D.C.
& London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
DEWEY, D.R. (1984). The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the
perennial Triticeae. In Gustafson, J.P., Gene manipulation in plant improvement, pp 209-279. Plenum
Publishing Corporation.
DE WINTER, B. (1987). Review of Genera graminum ~ Grasses of the World by Clayton, W.D. & S.A. Renvoize.
Bothalia 17: 299-300.
HATTERSLEY, P.W. (1987). Variations in photosynthetic pathway. In Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu, K.W., Campbell,
C.S. & Barkworth, M.E., Grass Systematics and Evolution, pp 49-64. Washington, D.C. & London:
Smithsonian Institute Press.
JUDZIEWICZ, E.J. (1984). Scrotochloa, a new genus of paleotropical grasses. Phytologia 56: 299-304.
KELLOGG, E.A. (1987). Phylogenetic analyses of the Gramineae. In Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu, K.W., Campbell,
C.S. & Barkworth, M.E., Grass Systematics and Evolution, pp 310-322. Washington, D.C. & London:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
LOVE, A. (1984). Conspectus of the Triticeae. Feddes Repertorium 95: 425-521.
NG, F.S.P.(1988). Problems in the organisation of taxonomic work. Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter
54: 2
—
=
SODERSTROM, T.R., HILU, H.W., CAMPBELL, C.S. & Barkworth, M.E. (1987). Grass systematics and evolution.
Washington, D.C. & London: Smithsonian Institution Press. oe
VELDKAMP, J.F., DE KONING, R. & SOSEF, M.S.M. (1986). Generic delimitation of Rotthoellia and related
genera (Gramineae). Blumea 31: 281-307.
WATSON, L. (1987). Automated descriptions of grass genera. In Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu, H.W., Campbell, C.S.
& Barkworth, M.E., Grass systematics and evolution, pp 343-351. Washington, D.C. & London: Smithsonian
Institution Press.
WEBSTER, R.D.(1987). The Australian Paniceae, 322 pp. Berlin and Stuttgart: J. Cramer.
B.K. Simon
Queensland Herbarium, Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qid 4068
R.D. Webster. The Australian Paniceae (Poaceae). Berlin and Stuttgart: J. Cramer, 1987.
This book is a precursor to the Flora of Australia account of the Paniceae. The
descriptions and keys have been computer generated using the DELTA package of M.
Dallwitz (1986) and are an extension of those produced by the same author for the
genus Digitaria (Webster 1984), both a result of three years spent at the Taxonomy Unit
of the Research School of Biological Sciences on a grant from the Australian Bureau of
Flora and Fauna, through the Australian Biological Resources Study scheme. Thus far
Book Reviews 169
these are the only two accounts of grasses to be produced by the DELTA system at
species level and this is the first floristic account. The computer generated keys and
descriptions of grass genera from the Taxonomy Unit are now well known documents
of the state of the art of the DELTA system (Watson & Dallwitz 1985 & 1988).
The 308 taxa of Australian Paniceae recognized by Webster are described against
4 character list of 208 characters, of which 42 are confined to vegetative characters, 52
to inflorescence characters, 104 to spikelet characters and one for chromosome number,
where known. Other information given includes native or introduced status, distribution
by state and the botanical regions of Barlow (1984) and vegetation regions of Moore
(1975), moisture requirements, flowering period, general remarks, representative specimen
Citations and relevant literature citations. In addition the full character list is given and
distribution maps of all entities are arranged alphabetically at the end of the book.
The arrangement of the text is alphabetical by genus and species, with keys to
species (where appropriate) being placed after the generic descriptions and remarks on
the genera. The DELTA descriptions are of the usual form, in that they are comparative,
and follow a standard character sequence, punctuation and terminology. A full stop
indicates the end of a sequence of characters describing a primary feature, a semicolon
separates the characters and a comma is used where more than one character state
occurs. Additional comments covering information not mentioned by the character list
are contained in brackets.
The publication of this floristic compilation within a relatively short time of the
completion of the research work is indeed a very impressive feat, both a function of
efficiency of the DELTA system and the author’s good manipulation of the system and
of the diligence of the author himself.
Before any comments are made concerning observed deficiencies of the work a
few comments on the DELTA system and my experiences in using it, both with Websters’s
data, generously provided on tape from the Taxonomy Unit, and my own data set on
the Andropogoneae, are worth making. Webster uses one items file (data base on taxa)
for both genera and species whereas for the Andropogoneae | created separate files for
the species of each genus and for the genera; in this way | found the generation of
descriptions and keys to be more manageable in terms of the different sorts of characters
that constitute genera from those that make up species. Furthermore extreme care has
to be taken in weighting the characters required for key generation as opposed to those
needed for inclusion in a description. I feel that in the Webster keys some characters
which are difficult to discern have been included in the keys (in some cases the only
differentiating character) whereas they are essentially only should be included in descrip-
tions. Examples are couplet 14 of the key to genera (concerning disarticulation of the
spikelet) which cannot always be used as it depends on the age of the plant, and couplet
29 of the same key (concerning the shape of the pedicel apex) as the character is difficult
to apply (see comments on the same character later in the discussion on the key to the
species of Digitaria). An anomaly I discovered generating keys with the Webster Paniceae
data set was that sometimes a genus keyed out separately from its constituent species
when a key to both was generated. An example is the key to the species of Cenchrus
when the genus and four species ( C. echinatus, C. robustus, C. incertus and C. longispinus)
are keyed out as having the upper lemma smooth whereas the remaining species (C.
elymoides, C. biflorus, C. setiger, C. ciliaris, C. brownii and C. australis) are keyed as
having the upper lemma muricate. Although the anomaly is not reflected in any keys
in the book itself, it does show up in the descriptions of the relevant taxa.
In a number of cases Webster places together species of Paniceae where he regards
them as being glabrous and hairy forms of one species, however the grounds for such a
decision seem rather flimsy to me without any experimental evidence, and I prefer not
to follow this move. Examples are the placing of Brachiaria notochthona with glabrous
spikelets with B. gilesii (treated as a Urochloa by Webster), and the placing of B. windersii
with hairy pedicels in synonymy with B. praetervisa (as a Urochioa).
In a few cases Webster presents results which are not taxonomically correct. For
example he confuses the identity of Digitaria milanjiana with the form of D. eriantha
subsp. pentzii previously called D. decumbens and commonly known as Pangola Grass.
170 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
The former species is in Australia but is only known in cultivation, whereas the latter
cultivar has escaped and become established in a number of foredune regions in
Queensland. The species Pseudochaetochloa australiensis, a dioecious species previously
only thought to have been collected in the male state, is now known to be represented
in the female state by the grass Pennisetum arnhemicum (Macfarlane, pers. comm.).
This fact was apparently known to Webster but there is no indication of it in his text.
Two species of Oplismenus (O. aemulus and O. imbecillis) are placed together in synonymy
under O. hirtellus (also incidentally treated in the same way by Davey & Clayton 1978),
but the two are distinctly different, particularly the leaf shapes, and grow sympatrically
in the rain-forest floors of south-eastern Australia. Within the same genus the variety
mollis of O. undulatifolius is placed in synonymy with the type variety from Italy.
However the entity is morphologically different, probably a function of its phytogeography,
if indeed it is the same species. For the time being I am following the status given it
by Vickery (1975).
In a few cases I think Webster incorporates too much variation in spikelet size
in some of his species and the situation is better expressed taxonomically if recognition
is given to the more discrete entities. An example which comes to mind is the native
Hymenachne acutigluma which has bigger spikelets than the South American H. amplex-
icaulis but is placed in synonymy with the latter species. The neotropical species has
recently been established as a pasture plant in Australia and is likely to become naturalised
so it is useful to be able to tell them apart. Another example are the two native species
Eriochloa australiensis and E. longiglumis, which have been placed together by both
Webster and Vickery (1975) but the latter has spikelets which are distinctively longer.
Cenchrus pennisetiformis is placed in synonymy with C. ciliaris but the character of
basal bristle fusion, disclaimed by Webster, can be applied consistently. On the other
hand C. australis R. Br. is resurrected from C. caliculatus on the grounds of having
smaller involucres and spikelets but I do not consider these characters to be of sufficient
magnitude to warrant specific delimitation.
There are a few examples of Webster’s names being replaced by more correct
names, these may not have been known to the author or were published at about the
same time. Examples are Holcolemma dispar W. Clayton for Paspalidium inaequale (F.
Muell.) Hughes (Clayton 1987), Panicum laevinode Lindley for P. whitei J. Black (Jacobs
1984) and Ichnanthus pallens var. majus (Nees) Stieber for I. vicinus (Bailey) Merr.
(Stieber 1987). Lazarides (1980) has Panicum luzonense Presl (a name not mentioned
by Webster) as a synonym of P. cambogiense Balansa but this was published 60 years
before Balansa’s name; if they apply to the same species the former is the correct name.
Cenchrus setigerus is wrong botanical Latin and must be corrected to C setiger.
Species omitted by Webster include Arthragrostis aristiglumis B. Simon, Echin-
ochloa picta (Koenig) Michael and Paspalum wettsteinii Hackel. Spinifex X alterniflorus
Nees is mentioned in the text but not keyed out.
The key to Digitaria is essentially the same as Webster (1984). The basic flaw of
this key is that the character of pedicel apex is confused in definition (for example I
find the distinction between the three states of truncate, cupuliform and discoid, as
illustrated by the photographs referred to, very difficult to apply) and yet is used as the
first entry to the key.
The big taxonomic decision made in this book, resulting in many nomenclatural
changes, involves the transfer of all species of Brachiaria except B. eruciformis and of
Panicum maximum to the genus Urochloa. This is based on a group of characters
previously not considered instead of the classical differences, the main one of which is
__ Spikelet orientation. These new characters include texture of the upper lemma, point of
_ disarticulation of the spikelet and whether the upper lemma is mucronate. Other characters
based on leaf anatomy (Hattersley 1987) support these findings to a certain extent. While
Webster's ideas certainly appear to have merit I feel to accept the changes for Australia
before a study has been made on the generic limits of these genera as a whole is slightly
premature. Such work 1s currently being undertaken at the University of Oklahoma and
the outcome of the research based on many characters and all relevant species is awaited.
The distribution maps at the end of the book give a good impression with the
actual distributions laid over the geobotanical regions of Barlow (1984). Flora of Australia
Book Reviews 171
policy is now to follow Barlow’s revised botanical regions (Barlow 1986) so that Webster’s
maps will have to be redrafted for the official Flora account. In most maps the area
occupied by an entity is completely blocked out but in others (e.g. some species of
Digitaria) the area is covered by a mosaic of dots; one technique would have sufhced.
The method of construction of the maps is rather a mystery in terms of the numbers
of specimens that were examined. In the case of the Brisbane material that was loaned
to Webster only about 10% of the Paniceae was actually requested. A comparison with
the HERBRECS generated maps from the Queensland Herbarium revealed a fairly close
similarity for most species that were compared.
The native or introduced status of a number of species is different from that
previously recorded. Two examples are Pennisetum alopecuroides (L.) Sprengel and
Panicum incomtum Trin., both regarded by Webster to be introduced but thought of by
others to be native.
References
BARLOW, B.A. (1984). Proposal for Delineation of Botanical Regions in Australia. Brunonia 7: 195-201.
BARLOW, B.A. (1986). A revised natural regions map for Australia. Brunonia 8: 387-392.
CLAYTON, W.D. (1987). Miscellaneous notes on panicoid grasses. Kew Bulletin 42: 401-403.
DALLWITZ, M.J. (1986). User’s guide to the DELTA system. A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions.
CSIRO, Division of Entomology.
DAVEY, J.C. & Clayton, W.D. (1978). Some multiple discriminant function studies on Oplismenus (Gramineae).
Kew Bulletin 33: 147-157.
HATTERSLEY, P.W. (1987). Variations in photosynthetic pathway. In Soderstrom, [.R., Hilu, K.W., Campbell,
C.S. & Barkworth, M.E. (eds), Grass systematics and evolution. Washington D.C. & London: Smithsonian
Institution Press.
JACOBS, S.W.L. (1984). An earlier name for Panicum whitei (Gramineae). Kew Bulletin 40: 662.
LAZARIDES, M. (1980). The tropical grasses of Southeast Asia. Vaduz: J. Cramer.
MOORE, R.M. (1975). Australian Grasslands. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
Sas M. (1987). Revision of Jchnanthus sect. Foveolatus (Gramineae: Panicoideae). Systematic Botany 12:
{ 6
VICKERY, J.W. (1975). Flora of New South Wales, Gramineae 19: 125-306.
WATSON, L. & DALLWITZ, M.J. (1985). Australian Grass Genera: anatomy, morphology, keys, and classification
(Second Edition). Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Biological Sciences.
WATSON, L. & DALLWITZ, M.J. (1988). Grass Genera of the World: ifiustrations of characters, descripttons,
classification, interactive identification, information retrieval.
scree Pittal (1984). A revision of the genus Digitaria Haller (Paniceae: Poaceae) in Australia. Brunontia 6:
131-216.
B.K. Simon
Queensland Herbarium, Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068
172 Austrobaileya 3(1): 1989
CORRIGENDUM
Austrobaileya 2(5) 1988
p 514. The caption for the distribution maps should read A. D. nummularia. B. D.
ovata. C. D. major.
S. R. Hampson, Government Printer, Queensiand—1989
104400
Notes for Authors
Austrobaileya publishes original papers in systematic_botany and related fields.
Preference will be given to papers relating to the flora of Queensland. All papers are
refereed and the editorial committee reserves the right to reject papers.
Manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate to The Editor, Austrobaileya, Queens-
land Herbarium, Department of Primary Industries, Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld
4068. They must be double-spaced typewritten, with 2.5 cm margins in the first instance.
After refereeing, the corrected manuscript may alternatively be submitted on an MSDOS
disk as an unformatted ASCII file (DOS Text File Format, e.g. CTRL-F5, | in WordPerfect
Version 4.2 or 5.0), saved twice, accompanied by a printed copy. All illustrations should
he submitted with the text. One set of proofs will be sent to authors.
For style and layout the most recent number of Austrobaileya should be followed,
particularly in the use of subheadings for distribution, etymology, etc. A detailed guide
may be obtained from the editor. Papers must be concise and illustrations should make
economical use of available space.
Where possible illustrations should be submitted in a size suitable for reproduction
without reduction in size. The maximum size of a printed illustration is 12.5 cm X 18.5
cm. Do not put lettering on the illustration but indicate separately on a photocopy or
overlay. Illustrations should be cited in the text. Typed captions should be supplied on
a separate page. All illustrations, both line drawings and photographs, are to be numbered
as figures in a common sequence. Published illustrations remain the property of the
Queensland Herbarium.
Tables should be as simple as possible. Long and/or complicated tables should
be avoided. The tables should be numbered consecutively and each should be cited in
the text.
Standard Abbreviations
Titles of journals cited in the text should be abbreviated according to Botanico-
Periodicum-Huntianum (Hunt Botanical Library, 1968) while names of books should be
abbreviated in accordance with F.A. Stafleu and R.S. Cowan, Taxonomic Literature, edn
2 (W. Junk, 1976-1988). In bibliographies the titles of both journals and books should
be given in full. All entries in the bibliography are to be referred to in the text and all
references to papers or books in narrative text are to be included in the bibliography.
Author abbreviations should follow the Draft Index of Author Abbreviations
compiled at the Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (HMSO, 1980). Acronyms used
for herbaria cited in the text should be in accordance with P.K. Holmgren, W. Kreuken
and E.K. Schofield (1981), Index Herbariorum Pt 1, edn 7, Regnum Vegetabile 106.
Other abbreviations which may be used in citing specimens are S.F. (State Forest),
S.F.R. (State Forest Reserve), L.A. (Logging Area), T-.R. (Timber Reserve) and an AQ
‘number: This number is the computerised collection number situated on the sheet and/
or on the label of specimens housed in the Queensland Herbarium (BRI). It is distinct
from the BRI number which is a framed sheet number associated with the name
“Queensland Herbarium Brisbane”, stamped on the sheet.
Austrobaileya 3(1): 1-172 (1989)
CONTENTS
A new species of Coix L. aaeeae) from Australia
B.K. Simon .... depts df Bike 4
Ceropegia cumingiana. Decne (Asclepiadaceae)
P.V. Bruyns & P.J. Forster |
The genus Zornia J. Gmelin i rear meet in Australia
S.T. Reynolds & A.E..Holland . ea fee
Two new species of Eucalyptus iia aa nae from central EAS PHENDD
A.R. Bean & M.I.H. Brooker mn 7 i 4 :
A new species of Marsdenia R. Br. cand seein ie from eastern Australia
J.B: Williams . ee, | SRY Baye 28 be ata
Kailarsenia Tirvengadum emend. Puttock (Rubiaceae: Gardenieae) in
Australia ,
C.F. Puttock ......
The genus Ancana F. Muell. EAGER? i in Australia
L.W. Jessup 5 Dig ts dah tte
Secamone R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae: hciaipiiastnataacaie Es in Australia
P.J. Forster & K. Harold . ee ore ee
Studies in Australian grasses: 4. Taxonomic and nomenclatural studies
in Australian Andropogoneae
B.K. Simon eT
Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 4. Clematocissus Planchon
B.R. Jackes oP. bid thay Sn
Bryophytes in a sub- Prats MENS eapengiey
J. Windolf . | MD ewe ain se) e ins
Notes on hecienbadincete- |
P.]. Forster
Notes on Trachymene pina pr Eont yt in LER, l
A.E. Holland . or ia
New species of Bulbophyllum section Oxysepalum (Orchidaceae) in
Australia
B. Gray & D.L. Jones . .
Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 5. Sena gees ORE) Planchon
B.R. Jackes Se See 7
NOTES
Eriocaulon longifollum Nees ex Kunth (Eriocaulaceae), a new record for
Australia
2 eg) Bc) a
PLANT PROFILE
Sani scandens C. White ©
. Ross .. .. a
Book Reviews ........
Corrigendum
101
103
109
135
141
149
159
163
167
172